Rebuild a 2.7L or 3.0L six motor, which is cheaper? |
|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
Rebuild a 2.7L or 3.0L six motor, which is cheaper? |
Justinp71 |
Feb 16 2016, 12:20 PM
Post
#41
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1,606 Joined: 11-October 04 From: Sacramento, CA Member No.: 2,922 Region Association: None |
I'd also ask yourself what kind of motor do you want? A proper (right cams, timing, etc...) carbed motor is a different animal than fuel injected motor, imho.
I ran a webber carbed/cammed 3.0L for years (now rebuilt into a 3.2L), it was a blast of a motor. Good power/weight with the 914, sound was amazing too. Very reliable for me, seems like most sixes that don't have an old un-maintained CIS system are reliable. I drag raced a modern 6.0 GTO at laguna seca down the main straight and we were neck and neck. Fuel injection would add mpg, smoothness and cleaner air. This is because the old IDA webber design requires a fuel mixture of around 12:1 at cruise to keep the idle circuits to operate smooth. |
jimkelly |
Feb 16 2016, 12:41 PM
Post
#42
|
Delaware USA Group: Members Posts: 4,969 Joined: 5-August 04 From: Delaware, USA Member No.: 2,460 Region Association: MidAtlantic Region |
i'd sure like to see someone else do a mcmark style turbo 4.
http://www.914world.com/bbs2/index.php?sho...54&hl=turbo |
Mark Henry |
Feb 16 2016, 12:45 PM
Post
#43
|
that's what I do! Group: Members Posts: 20,065 Joined: 27-December 02 From: Port Hope, Ontario Member No.: 26 Region Association: Canada |
i'd sure like to see someone else do a mcmark style turbo 4. http://www.914world.com/bbs2/index.php?sho...54&hl=turbo (IMG:style_emoticons/default/hijacked.gif) Not to be a dink but this is a discussion on the six. |
Mark Henry |
Feb 16 2016, 12:47 PM
Post
#44
|
that's what I do! Group: Members Posts: 20,065 Joined: 27-December 02 From: Port Hope, Ontario Member No.: 26 Region Association: Canada |
I'd also ask yourself what kind of motor do you want? The other side of this coin is what kind of motor are you getting? I've seen some real abortion builds out there.... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/dry.gif) |
jimkelly |
Feb 16 2016, 02:56 PM
Post
#45
|
Delaware USA Group: Members Posts: 4,969 Joined: 5-August 04 From: Delaware, USA Member No.: 2,460 Region Association: MidAtlantic Region |
i hear you.
but i see it as a 175-200 hp thread, selective reading i guess (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) i am driving one of those abortions you are reffering too (IMG:style_emoticons/default/sad.gif) and i know it. |
Justinp71 |
Feb 16 2016, 03:30 PM
Post
#46
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1,606 Joined: 11-October 04 From: Sacramento, CA Member No.: 2,922 Region Association: None |
I have a supposedly decent 2.7 core...I'll need to do a leak-down test to see if it's worth messing with. It has all the signs of the PO's story of a rebuild. Came out of a '77, but is a '74 case with oil tensioners, 11 blade fan, 930 valve covers etc. Even saying that, I'd probably like to start with a 3.0 case if I could get one for the same $...and a 3.2 for sure if I could find a good one for ~$8k. Sounds like someone did some work on it, see if you can find evidence of time certs on the head studs. Someone told me that the majority of the 2.7's had to be rebuilt with time certs by now, as they didn't last long from the factory. Although my 2.7 was not rebuilt... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/sad.gif) I would recommend fresh top end gaskets (reseal the chain housings and cam towers too) when installing a 2.7 (or any used motor). My old one leaked like crazy! Although I guess it could be a rabbit hole if you start pulling the motor apart. At least install new versions of the easy to access gaskets, then if it leaks you'll be more easily able to find the leaks. |
r_towle |
Feb 16 2016, 03:48 PM
Post
#47
|
Custom Member Group: Members Posts: 24,683 Joined: 9-January 03 From: Taxachusetts Member No.: 124 Region Association: North East States |
i'd sure like to see someone else do a mcmark style turbo 4. http://www.914world.com/bbs2/index.php?sho...54&hl=turbo (IMG:style_emoticons/default/hijacked.gif) Not to be a dink but this is a discussion on the six. i thought you did not give a (garage level of interest and stress) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/confused24.gif) |
Mark Henry |
Feb 16 2016, 04:22 PM
Post
#48
|
that's what I do! Group: Members Posts: 20,065 Joined: 27-December 02 From: Port Hope, Ontario Member No.: 26 Region Association: Canada |
i'd sure like to see someone else do a mcmark style turbo 4. http://www.914world.com/bbs2/index.php?sho...54&hl=turbo (IMG:style_emoticons/default/hijacked.gif) Not to be a dink but this is a discussion on the six. i thought you did not give a (garage level of interest and stress) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/confused24.gif) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/huh.gif) Damn (IMG:style_emoticons/default/busted.gif) |
mb911 |
Feb 16 2016, 05:07 PM
Post
#49
|
914 Guru Group: Members Posts: 7,393 Joined: 2-January 09 From: Burlington wi Member No.: 9,892 Region Association: Upper MidWest |
I had a 74 2.7 pre thermal reactors with 50k on it in my conversion 15 years ago. I rebuilt the engine only because I bought everything new at a vw swap meet for 100 dollars (what a deal) it was more of while Ivan at it. The engine had no time certs so I was going to do that while I was at it. I bought the time certs and looked at the course threads of the time certs and looked at how they were only .010 or so from breaking into the spigots that I decided not to do it. Keep in mind I have built hundreds of aircraft engines and also many porsche engines as well so take this with a grain of salt but the only reason to put time certs in is to repair pulled threads not to give extra strength..
Flame suit on |
Justinp71 |
Feb 16 2016, 10:51 PM
Post
#50
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1,606 Joined: 11-October 04 From: Sacramento, CA Member No.: 2,922 Region Association: None |
OK from Wayne's Book (pricing is 15 years old?), machine work you would do rebuilding a 2.7 but not on a 3.0.
$495 Line Bore $350 Install Time Certs $130 Oil system bypass mod $29 Case saver inserts =$1004, say *120% for today's prices = $1205 Looks like it is cheaper to rebuild a 2.7. BTW His total was $3,300 for all the machine work (includes valvejob, rods and crank recon, etc...) Total parts and tools was $2,872 which includes $1,400 for p&c's. Grand total = $6200 This is a complete rebuild, only large purchase hard parts were the p&c's. EDIT-This Grand Total is older pricing from Wayne's book, please use your judgement for current pricing. Quick note on the timecerts- They seem almost mandatory to me? The 2.7 I had you could only torq down about half of the headstuds... the other half wanted to pull out. |
raynekat |
Feb 16 2016, 11:10 PM
Post
#51
|
Advanced Member Group: Members Posts: 2,167 Joined: 30-December 14 From: Coeur d'Alene, Idaho Member No.: 18,263 Region Association: Pacific Northwest |
OK from Wayne's Book (pricing is 15 years old?), machine work you would do rebuilding a 2.7 but not on a 3.0. $495 Line Bore $350 Install Time Certs $130 Oil system bypass mod $29 Case saver inserts =$1004, say *120% for today's prices = $1205 Looks like it is cheaper to rebuild a 2.7. BTW His total was $3,300 for all the machine work (includes valvejob, rods and crank recon, etc...) Total parts and tools was $2,872 which includes $1,400 for p&c's. Grand total = $6200 This is a complete rebuild, only large purchase hard parts were the p&c's. I'm going out on a limb here, but IMO there is vitually NO WAY you can do a "quality" rebuild of any 911 6 cylinder engine for $6200. The prices in Wayne's book are very out of date. Parts are much, much higher now. Ever price a set of pistons & cylinders lately? And easy $4-6k just there. Depending on how many parts are worn out, the picture just gets worse. The big builders (i.e. Rothsport) will charge you $20k up to $30k to do a complete engine rebuild. There's a reason for that cost....and it's not all labor. There is a lot of machining required, again quite expensive. I think you're all kidding yourselves in this link. Good condition, low mileage engines are rare as can be. So now you're stuck with a rebuild on whatever condition engine you can fine. To do a top end only is really a sketchy idea. Add to this that most of us....even the mechanically adept....would be in over our heads with a 6 cylinder engine rebuild. So much experience goes into the proper rebuild that the average guy is going to miss something during the process, and then you flushed a bunch of money down the drain. Again all the above IMHO. My takeaway.... rebuilding a 911 engine is not a trivial or inexpensive proposition, and not for the weak hearted. But they are the best sounding automotive engine when done correctly bar none. |
raynekat |
Feb 16 2016, 11:19 PM
Post
#52
|
Advanced Member Group: Members Posts: 2,167 Joined: 30-December 14 From: Coeur d'Alene, Idaho Member No.: 18,263 Region Association: Pacific Northwest |
One thing I forgot about if you're going to do your own engine work. There are lots of speciality tools you'll need....i.e. the cam wrenches, etc. All that stuff adds up fast You'll go through a couple thousand really quick on the necessary engine cradle, specialty tools, torque wrenches, etc, etc.
Wayne's book is very good at detailing all the tools you'll need for the various jobs. |
Justinp71 |
Feb 16 2016, 11:26 PM
Post
#53
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1,606 Joined: 11-October 04 From: Sacramento, CA Member No.: 2,922 Region Association: None |
I do agree it's not a cheap or easy task. There are several people that are mechanically inclined that have rebuilt their own motors on pelican. It's not easy but can be done. It's just the overhead cam's that create most of the complication, other than that its not too far off from a type 4. But I do agree it is a risk to build your own motor.
As far as pricing I think for the machine work +20% would be close, best to call your local machine shop to verify. P&C's can be rebuilt if you have nikasil's I bought a set from EBS for ~$2600. Crankshafts are rare and expensive, luckily you only need one if the old one was badly damaged. They are nitrided so they are very strong. Another note it is another level of complexity to do the bottom end, I would be less worried to tackle just a top end rebuild than an entire rebuild. You can also do alot of the work yourself and have a shop assemble the bottom end for you. Top end is still complex, but you can take your time until you get it right. Its also very labor intensive, like 80+hours. That I believe is part of the reason for the high rebuild costs. Buy a core inspect it very well, add up the costs, if it ends up being too expensive just sell the parts off... |
jcd914 |
Feb 17 2016, 12:28 AM
Post
#54
|
Advanced Member Group: Members Posts: 2,081 Joined: 7-February 08 From: Sacramento, CA Member No.: 8,684 Region Association: Northern California |
Many machine shops are not going to be equipped to machine a 911 engine or won't mess with them (too much risk) and then there are some that you would not want to be doing your machining.
When Jeff had his 2.7 apart and took it down to Competition Engineering they looked over the parts and quoted him $7K just for machine work. He found a 3.2 in a 912 in LA for $7.5K (I think) and he had go down and pull the engine. Jim |
0396 |
Feb 17 2016, 12:31 AM
Post
#55
|
Advanced Member Group: Members Posts: 2,046 Joined: 13-October 03 From: L.A. Calif Member No.: 1,245 Region Association: Southern California |
i hear you. but i see it as a 175-200 hp thread, selective reading i guess (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) i am driving one of those abortions you are reffering too (IMG:style_emoticons/default/sad.gif) and i know it. Its only in your mind (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif). It could be a good build, but who cares its yours. |
0396 |
Feb 17 2016, 12:38 AM
Post
#56
|
Advanced Member Group: Members Posts: 2,046 Joined: 13-October 03 From: L.A. Calif Member No.: 1,245 Region Association: Southern California |
OK from Wayne's Book (pricing is 15 years old?), machine work you would do rebuilding a 2.7 but not on a 3.0. $495 Line Bore $350 Install Time Certs $130 Oil system bypass mod $29 Case saver inserts =$1004, say *120% for today's prices = $1205 Looks like it is cheaper to rebuild a 2.7. BTW His total was $3,300 for all the machine work (includes valvejob, rods and crank recon, etc...) Total parts and tools was $2,872 which includes $1,400 for p&c's. Grand total = $6200 This is a complete rebuild, only large purchase hard parts were the p&c's. I'm going out on a limb here, but IMO there is vitually NO WAY you can do a "quality" rebuild of any 911 6 cylinder engine for $6200. The prices in Wayne's book are very out of date. Parts are much, much higher now. Ever price a set of pistons & cylinders lately? And easy $4-6k just there. Depending on how many parts are worn out, the picture just gets worse. The big builders (i.e. Rothsport) will charge you $20k up to $30k to do a complete engine rebuild. There's a reason for that cost....and it's not all labor. There is a lot of machining required, again quite expensive. I think you're all kidding yourselves in this link. Good condition, low mileage engines are rare as can be. So now you're stuck with a rebuild on whatever condition engine you can fine. To do a top end only is really a sketchy idea. Add to this that most of us....even the mechanically adept....would be in over our heads with a 6 cylinder engine rebuild. So much experience goes into the proper rebuild that the average guy is going to miss something during the process, and then you flushed a bunch of money down the drain. Again all the above IMHO. My takeaway.... rebuilding a 911 engine is not a trivial or inexpensive proposition, and not for the weak hearted. But they are the best sounding automotive engine when done correctly bar none. Very true, price of admission for a great builder is 20 / 30 k these days. |
Mark Henry |
Feb 17 2016, 05:49 AM
Post
#57
|
that's what I do! Group: Members Posts: 20,065 Joined: 27-December 02 From: Port Hope, Ontario Member No.: 26 Region Association: Canada |
(IMG:style_emoticons/default/agree.gif)
But DIY can keep cost down especially on a stock rebuild. But if you're thinking performance below will give you idea on what's involved with a hot street build. Be clear my engine is just a "mild" build, "wild" could double the cost...easy. I'd say I have $11K into my engine, did all the machining myself (friend helped on some of the hard bits) except the rods and balance. Got my cylinders replated through LN. Waited for deals on some things and a trade on my carbs and dizzy so they would add another $3.5K. BTW during the build I was cold offered $5K for the Mahle RS piston and cylinder set, my cost was $2600 for piston and plating. I wouldn't sell it at firesale for less than $25K, really I doubt I'd sell unless it was an offer of at least $30K USD. But then I have no interest in selling it, it's not for sale. Below is the build list to give you an idea of what's involved and I 'd say I have more like 120+ hours labour into this engine. Engine build sheet for 3.0 1974 914 six conversion Engine 3.0L, 70.4mm X 95mm, 10.1: 1 CR, Twin Plug Case, 1979, 3.0, serial # *6399XXX, 930/13, 930.101.104.4R, Supertec head studs Crank, stock, std/std, polished and magnafluxed, converted to CW distributor drive gear Rods, stock, rebuilt big and small end, new bushings, ARP bolts and nuts Flywheel stock, with custom 914-901 adapter ring, CSP 228mm bus HD pressure plate Full engine balance, pressure plate and adapter ring balanced separately Main bearings, new glyco, DFL (Dry Film Lube) coated #8 Main bearing, good used original Porsche, DFL coated Rod bearings, new glyco, DFL coated Intermediate shaft bearings, new Porsche, DFL coated Gasket set, new nose and rear main seal, Supertec sealant kit Pump, stock blueprinted and DFL coated , cooler stock 911 modified to 914/6 spec Pistons, Mahle, new, 3.0 RS, DFL coated skirts, ceramic coated tops, Goetze rings Cylinders, stock 3.0 nickasil, replated Milenium/LN engineering, stock gaskets, .025mm base gasket Heads, 3.0 big port, minor port work, twin plug Valves, stock size, exhaust new TRW sodium, intake new AE Valve springs, Eibach race, retainers early stock, keepers stock modified Ceramic chambers and exhaust ports Cams, WEB-CAM, 120/104, set at 5.2mm/.10 lash, 964 cores modified to 901 spec Towers, spray bars R&R, tapped and cleaned, rockers resurfaced, RSR rocker shaft seals Chains, new IWIS, new cam sprockets, keys and pins Tensioners, hydraulic, no fail modification 906 style cylinder cooling deflectors Cooler, stock, 3.0, modified for 914 Carburetors, Weber 40mm IDA, rebuilt, new carb kits, 34mm venturies, 135 main jets, F3 emulsion tubes, 180 air correction, 55 idle, Ported stock manifolds, custom phenolic spacers. K&N filters and rain hats, Weber linkage Carter fuel pump Distributor, Twin Plug, Patrick/Jarvis, CW, MSD internals, uses Jaguar XJS-12 cap (1989-1996), Plug wires custom labled twin plug, Patrick Motorsports Ignition, MSD 6AL, twin MSD high vibration coils, max RPM 6800 Spark plugs, NGK BPR5ES (BPR6ES also available for tuning) Headers, 914, 1-1/2” MSDS, ceramic coated Add the fan/alt, shroud, custom wire harness, etc... Bought most of the parts 4-5 years ago when the Canadian buck was at par, start pricing that puppy out at today's prices and your butthole will pucker (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wink.gif) |
Mark Henry |
Feb 17 2016, 06:13 AM
Post
#58
|
that's what I do! Group: Members Posts: 20,065 Joined: 27-December 02 From: Port Hope, Ontario Member No.: 26 Region Association: Canada |
One thing I forgot about if you're going to do your own engine work. There are lots of speciality tools you'll need....i.e. the cam wrenches, etc. All that stuff adds up fast You'll go through a couple thousand really quick on the necessary engine cradle, specialty tools, torque wrenches, etc, etc. Wayne's book is very good at detailing all the tools you'll need for the various jobs. I've thought about doing a tool rental, I think I have just about everything except an early main seal installer, but it's likely not feasible because I'm in Canada. Plus I have no idea what fair rates would be, plus deposit, a percentage for tool damage, insurance, etc. |
jimkelly |
Feb 17 2016, 07:25 AM
Post
#59
|
Delaware USA Group: Members Posts: 4,969 Joined: 5-August 04 From: Delaware, USA Member No.: 2,460 Region Association: MidAtlantic Region |
boxsterfan,
what kind of max budget for engine rebuild were you hoping was realistic when you posted this thread? what kind of budget you setting aside for related conversion parts and other general upgrades to accompany the more powerful engine? aside from these, will you be paying for any labor? everyone wants a six, no doubt, but many settle for suby or chevy power due to less cost, and in some cases more modern transaxles. all the best with your car, looking forward to seeing it progress. gas guzzling v8, sloppy trans, jim (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) quote name='boxsterfan' date='Feb 15 2016, 05:41 PM' post='2303525'] Which /6 motor is cheaper to rebuild? 2.7L or the 3.0L? 1. Assume core motor is in good condtion and no crazy findings when you tear it down. 2. Assume you are building the motor for longevity 3. You are putting this in a 914/6 conversion (was /4) [/quote] |
Luke M |
Feb 17 2016, 07:28 AM
Post
#60
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1,400 Joined: 8-February 05 From: WNY Member No.: 3,574 Region Association: North East States |
I like Mark have built a 2.7 rs spec engine and currently doing a 83 3.0 for my brothers 914.
I can tell you this, my brother got a sweet deal on the 3.0. The po was upgrading to a 3.6 and the 3.0 was a running engine per the shop doing the swap. If you look around like we did there's deals to be had. With that said both engines had there fair share of problems. On the 3.0 it was resealed by the shop doing the swap and had pressure fed tensioners installed at the same time. I started to check the 3.0 over and figured I'd better retorque the head studs. That came to an end fast after I snapped off a lower stud. It did start to take the torque but it didn't feel right then snap. Long story short apart it came. So far the main difference in the two builds is the machine shop cost. My 2.7 had a linebore to standard , shuffle pins, case savers on all headstuds/case through chain stud/ trans mount studs, spigot faces machined flat, all that work was done at Ollie's machine ( go to their website to view the cost). That was not a cheap machine shop bill but it needed to be done. I had a local shop polish and inspect the crank, install new rod wrist pin bushings, and clean a few other misc parts. The same shop removed one of the snapped off head studs in the 3.0, polished the crank , inspected the rods, cleaned the case, cam towers, and chain boxes. Once the case on both engines where sealed up the prices seamed to be close on other parts. The 3.0 parts seam to be a little bit higher in cost. Both engines got replated nikasil cylinders and new je pistons. The added cost to the 3.0 came when we went to buy big port heads. They need to be sent out for a rebuild yet but total cost once done is $1300.00 on heads alone. Cams/rockers need to be sent out at a cost of $700.00. Based on what is or is being done on both engines the 3.0 is still well under cost of the 2.7. If I had to do it again I'd opt for a 3.0 for sure . Both engines are getting the same induction, ignition, exhaust so the big expense comes down to machine shop repairs. |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 8th January 2025 - 10:21 AM |
All rights reserved 914World.com © since 2002 |
914World.com is the fastest growing online 914 community! We have it all, classifieds, events, forums, vendors, parts, autocross, racing, technical articles, events calendar, newsletter, restoration, gallery, archives, history and more for your Porsche 914 ... |