Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V  1 2 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Single carburetor setup, Setup single carburetor/distributor for a 1.8
cmxiv 74
post Aug 10 2017, 02:04 AM
Post #1


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 11
Joined: 9-August 17
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 21,334
Region Association: Southern California



Hi, I need to know if anyone around has a functional, decent (not performance, not perfect) setup that involves a center mounted carburetor on a 1.8 L engine. While I'm new to the subject I'm well aware about the inefficiency of the center mounted single carburetor setup on 914. Yes, it sucks ! But I have to deal with the facts and the reality. This are the facts: I bought my 74 1.8 already converted on single carburetor, (looks like a Weber, made in Spain, no other markings visible without removal) paired with a centrifugal advance distributor (not sure what model, no markings visible without removal) not know when was converted, or if the engine is stock or not. While has a decent acceleration response, decent power it runs very bad, inconsistent warm startup, high idle, rich, overall I can't find a "sweet spot". So far I changed the points, condenser, wires, spark plus, spark wires, distributor cap and rotor. The car is in what I call "active" repair/restoration which means that I have to keep it running and do work on it whenever I have the time and a place to work on it. So far is in my friends shop but while I will continue to have shop access I can not keep it there anymore, so it has to be parked on the street (it is registered and insured). For now I have to keep the car running with a single carburetor, so any other option is out.
Now... not sure if the centrifugal distributor is a good idea for this already bad setup, but I need opinion and advice from people who know how to do a proper setup for a single carb. I will add more info and photos over the next days Thank You !

PS. It looks like I have a 1.7 L not 1.8.The engine serial nr starts with EA, assigned to a 1973 1.7 L.


Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image Attached Image Attached Image Attached Image Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
VaccaRabite
post Aug 10 2017, 07:59 AM
Post #2


En Garde!
**********

Group: Admin
Posts: 13,553
Joined: 15-December 03
From: Dallastown, PA
Member No.: 1,435
Region Association: MidAtlantic Region



You may find people that have gotten single carbs to run, but you wont find many that have gotten them to run well. The problems you have stated are very very common with single carb set ups. they just don't work all that well becasue the fuel start to fall out of suspension before it hits the intake valve.

T1 engines got around this by running exhaust gasses up along the intake runners from the single carb to keep them warm and keep the fuel in suspension that way. 914s can't do that. Well, not easily.

Spend a little bit of money to get a dual carb setup, and you will be very happy that you did. Your car will run much better, and you will get more power out of your 1.7.

Zach
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
GeorgeRud
post Aug 10 2017, 08:49 AM
Post #3


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,725
Joined: 27-July 05
From: Chicagoland
Member No.: 4,482
Region Association: Upper MidWest



If you search around, you may be able to find a dual carb setup used for sale. Since the car is already running a carb, it should be an easy Saturday project to convert it to dual carbs and enjoy much better running.

A more expensive option would be conversion to EFI, but that would be a much bigger project.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Spoke
post Aug 10 2017, 09:01 AM
Post #4


Jerry
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 7,052
Joined: 29-October 04
From: Allentown, PA
Member No.: 3,031
Region Association: None



(IMG:style_emoticons/default/welcome.png)

Sounds like your carb/distributor setup is working ok. Personally I wouldn't put any money into a 1.7/1.8L engine. Besides a turbo or supercharger, the 1.7/1.8L will still be a low HP engine.

I've had 914's with a 1.7L (dual carbs), 1.8L (DJET FI), 2L (DJET), and 2056 (dual carbs). The 2L and 2056 nearly transform the car from the 1.7/1.8 engines.

Look around for someone doing a /6 or Suby conversion and dumping their 2L. I picked up my 2056 with dual carbs for less than $1k shipped.

Remember there's no replacement for displacement.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
bbrock
post Aug 10 2017, 10:34 AM
Post #5


914 Guru
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 5,269
Joined: 17-February 17
From: Montana
Member No.: 20,845
Region Association: Rocky Mountains



Long, long ago, I tried a single carb on both a 1.7L 914 and a VW bus. I never could get it to run properly. The problem was those intake runners that others have mention. So no dizzy swap was going to help. I finally swapped them for a pair of 34 ICTs which could be bought for very cheap back then. They still sucked for performance, but at least the cars were drivable.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
914_teener
post Aug 10 2017, 10:51 AM
Post #6


914 Guru
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 5,245
Joined: 31-August 08
From: So. Cal
Member No.: 9,489
Region Association: Southern California



So you need an expert on a setup that sucks?

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
struckn
post Aug 10 2017, 12:39 PM
Post #7


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,069
Joined: 9-November 11
From: South Central York Pennsyvania
Member No.: 13,764
Region Association: MidAtlantic Region



Here's my '74 with same set up. If tuned correctly and float adjusted right it isn't a bad set up. Only thing you must be aware of is that the Cam should be for carb not Fuel Injection. FI was the way they came when new. Also I think this is the only set up that has Electric Choke to help with satrating, and these are quiter then dual carb, The fuel mileage is better too.

https://youtu.be/H4t0M2wrhu8
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
struckn
post Aug 10 2017, 12:51 PM
Post #8


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,069
Joined: 9-November 11
From: South Central York Pennsyvania
Member No.: 13,764
Region Association: MidAtlantic Region



Here's my '74 with same set up. If tuned correctly and float adjusted right it isn't a bad set up. Only thing you must be aware of is that the Cam should be for carb not Fuel Injection. FI was the way they came when new. Click and WATCH MY YOU/TUBE below it tells the store. It's been 5 years since I made this video and I drive the car alot. Haven't had to adjust, tune or repair anything, still runs the same, no plans to change anything.

And to all you nay sayers (IMG:style_emoticons/default/bootyshake.gif)

https://youtu.be/H4t0M2wrhu8
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
bandjoey
post Aug 10 2017, 01:34 PM
Post #9


bandjoey
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,930
Joined: 26-September 07
From: Bedford Tx
Member No.: 8,156
Region Association: Southwest Region



Find a hot rod shop and you'll find a carb guy. Ask the FLAPs guys too. And Post a WTB for dual carbs and you'll be ever so happy.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
andys
post Aug 10 2017, 02:35 PM
Post #10


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,165
Joined: 21-May 03
From: Valencia, CA
Member No.: 721
Region Association: None



Out of desperation, after my FI left me standing for the fourth time ('73 2.0, 40 years ago), I made up my own single carb setup. Ford/Holley single barrel carb on an adapter plate, and an electric fuel pump. It actually ran quite well; biggest relief was that it started every time with no worries whatsoever. I eventually went with a dual Weber setup which took A LOT OF WORK to get it jetted somewhat right. Not sure it ran better than the single, but it sure looked cool!

Andys
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Al Meredith
post Aug 10 2017, 02:57 PM
Post #11


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 967
Joined: 4-November 04
From: Atlanta, ga
Member No.: 3,061



try two things: One, I remove the thick plastic intake gasket and replace it with a metal gasket. This way the heat from the head will transfer to the long runners and heat the intake charge. Second, replace the idle jet with a larger jet. The carb was probably jetted for a VW engine.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
ndfrigi
post Aug 10 2017, 03:14 PM
Post #12


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,953
Joined: 21-August 11
From: Orange County
Member No.: 13,474
Region Association: Southern California



I sold my friend's 73 1.7 yellow last 2015 thanksgiving day to an Ohio member (now my facebook friend), the car has #1 cylinder low compression with single weber carb. He and his wife drove it from SoCal to Vegas and all the way to Ohio for 2,500 miles trip within 5 days (i think) and with no issues.

Attached Image
Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
bbrock
post Aug 10 2017, 03:30 PM
Post #13


914 Guru
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 5,269
Joined: 17-February 17
From: Montana
Member No.: 20,845
Region Association: Rocky Mountains



QUOTE(bbrock @ Aug 10 2017, 10:34 AM) *

Long, long ago, I tried a single carb on both a 1.7L 914 and a VW bus. I never could get it to run properly. The problem was those intake runners that others have mention. So no dizzy swap was going to help. I finally swapped them for a pair of 34 ICTs which could be bought for very cheap back then. They still sucked for performance, but at least the cars were drivable.


I should probably amend my previous post to say that the problems I had with my single carbs were associated with cold weather. Whenever the temps would dip below about 40F, the cars would just die. The runners would literally build up a cake of frost on them. When the weather was warm, they ran okay except for the dead spot caused by the 009 dizzy. I just noticed the OP is in LA so my experience with single carbs in a colder climate might not be so relevant.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
cmxiv 74
post Aug 11 2017, 01:01 AM
Post #14


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 11
Joined: 9-August 17
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 21,334
Region Association: Southern California



Hi everyone, Thank you all for taking time and effort to make comments and for sharing your opinions. To make everything crystal clear please consider that my question/curiosities revolved around the existent setup on my car" center single carburetor", not about the common sense/better/ideal option (double carbs, injection or engine upgrades). I will eventually get there in the future, but not today or tomorrow. At the end of the day I would like to find a solution with the existing setup in place that will make sure the car can be started and driven (enjoyed) at least 100 miles/month for the next 6 months. The "to do list" on my car is pretty long, so due the "logistic reasons" I want to be sure that I can do as much as possible with the car in decent running condition before I will tune or replace the engine. Great/best performance, squeezing the last joule per second or a tiny fraction of HP from the engine or the mileage are not the issue right now.
So, not knowing who made the conversion back to the day (shop, garage, back yard) I have not clue if the came was swapped for the correct one (carburetor optimized) so I will presume was not. I will go to the shop over the weekend, pull out the carb and distributor, get all the info I can get from both parts and post it here to continue with fresh data.
As a personal curiosity...Just asking... My setup, the single central carburetor conversion kit was available on the market decades ago, people used this option for various reasons, (well... one...it was the cheapest). So how, over the years the shops or mechanics got away with using this very setup since there are so unreliable, horrible, snake oil POS and junk ?, After all when the client took his car out of the shop after a conversion it's supposed to run decent, no? Clients usually do not pay to have their vehicle grossly downgraded and turned unreliable? To add to the confusion after so many years the "single" kits are still offered for sale ! Again, just asking...

On a different note, just as info: Repairs I did myself: rebuild the brakes/calipers (not easy, not even close to any regular brake job repair due to the lack of documentation and the cumbersomeness of the design), (IMG:style_emoticons/default/welder.gif) fix the "imploded" clutch tunnel (a PITA, especially with limited welding shop tools) fixed the throttle cable tunnel, a huge array of electrical issue (including an preexisting hidden short that melted a bunch of wires under the dash, fire extinguisher required ), headlights, mechanical and electric, working from home on the upholstery (desert stored car... all the vinyl upholstery dead dried, crumbled, brittle and cracked), transmission shifter & linkage rebuild (I end up machining myself some Delrin bushing and metal sleeves... the aftermarket parts ordered were way beyond the specs... junk)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
cmxiv 74
post Aug 11 2017, 01:07 AM
Post #15


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 11
Joined: 9-August 17
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 21,334
Region Association: Southern California



QUOTE(Spoke @ Aug 10 2017, 10:01 AM) *

(IMG:style_emoticons/default/welcome.png)

Sounds like your carb/distributor setup is working ok. Personally I wouldn't put any money into a 1.7/1.8L engine. Besides a turbo or supercharger, the 1.7/1.8L will still be a low HP engine.

I've had 914's with a 1.7L (dual carbs), 1.8L (DJET FI), 2L (DJET), and 2056 (dual carbs). The 2L and 2056 nearly transform the car from the 1.7/1.8 engines.

Look around for someone doing a /6 or Suby conversion and dumping their 2L. I picked up my 2056 with dual carbs for less than $1k shipped.

Remember there's no replacement for displacement.


Agree, I'm looking around to do something like that in the future, but not in a rush at all. So far just 1.8 on the market.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
cmxiv 74
post Aug 11 2017, 01:18 AM
Post #16


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 11
Joined: 9-August 17
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 21,334
Region Association: Southern California



QUOTE(914_teener @ Aug 10 2017, 11:51 AM) *

So you need an expert on a setup that sucks?


Not an expert at all, they have no time for challenges or out of the box solution, I want just a fair opinion/advice from someone who drives a car with a similar setup, or had at one point a running setup like mine.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
cmxiv 74
post Aug 11 2017, 01:29 AM
Post #17


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 11
Joined: 9-August 17
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 21,334
Region Association: Southern California



QUOTE(struckn @ Aug 10 2017, 01:39 PM) *

Here's my '74 with same set up. If tuned correctly and float adjusted right it isn't a bad set up. Only thing you must be aware of is that the Cam should be for carb not Fuel Injection. FI was the way they came when new. Also I think this is the only set up that has Electric Choke to help with satrating, and these are quiter then dual carb, The fuel mileage is better too.

https://youtu.be/H4t0M2wrhu8


No clue about the cam and no clue how to have it check without a huge mess.
The electric choke is there and functional, probably set for warm climate (So Cal). I'm familiar with the electric choke system from Type 1/Pict on Beetle and KarmanGhia. Regarding being quiet...Can't tell ... the exhaust/muffler is really loud, it might be some performance package, not sure , but I have to dig around to find out.

Are you running a centrifugal advance distributor or vacuum ? If vacuum , where is connected ? Thank's
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
cmxiv 74
post Aug 11 2017, 01:38 AM
Post #18


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 11
Joined: 9-August 17
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 21,334
Region Association: Southern California



QUOTE(andys @ Aug 10 2017, 03:35 PM) *

Out of desperation, after my FI left me standing for the fourth time ('73 2.0, 40 years ago), I made up my own single carb setup. Ford/Holley single barrel carb on an adapter plate, and an electric fuel pump. It actually ran quite well; biggest relief was that it started every time with no worries whatsoever. I eventually went with a dual Weber setup which took A LOT OF WORK to get it jetted somewhat right. Not sure it ran better than the single, but it sure looked cool!

Andys


Pretty cool, Where there's a need there's a solution. Your setup reminds me of running my 1300 '66 Beetle (back to Europe, some decades ago), with a borrowed carburetor from a 1310 cc 1984 Dacia (Romanian car based on 1969 Renault 12). Same displacement, totally different animal, same story, home made plate adapter...but it worked OK (most of the time)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
cmxiv 74
post Aug 11 2017, 01:43 AM
Post #19


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 11
Joined: 9-August 17
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 21,334
Region Association: Southern California



QUOTE(Al Meredith @ Aug 10 2017, 03:57 PM) *

try two things: One, I remove the thick plastic intake gasket and replace it with a metal gasket. This way the heat from the head will transfer to the long runners and heat the intake charge. Second, replace the idle jet with a larger jet. The carb was probably jetted for a VW engine.


Thank you !
Noted, I will do that .
I asked myself if will make any difference the direct heat transfer to the carb from the engine via the runners. I will check the idle jet , but not sure what to compare with , or if there is a optimal size / setup. There is a total lack of info on the subject, or maybe I can't fin it.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
cmxiv 74
post Aug 11 2017, 01:53 AM
Post #20


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 11
Joined: 9-August 17
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 21,334
Region Association: Southern California



QUOTE(bbrock @ Aug 10 2017, 04:30 PM) *

QUOTE(bbrock @ Aug 10 2017, 10:34 AM) *

Long, long ago, I tried a single carb on both a 1.7L 914 and a VW bus. I never could get it to run properly. The problem was those intake runners that others have mention. So no dizzy swap was going to help. I finally swapped them for a pair of 34 ICTs which could be bought for very cheap back then. They still sucked for performance, but at least the cars were drivable.


I should probably amend my previous post to say that the problems I had with my single carbs were associated with cold weather. Whenever the temps would dip below about 40F, the cars would just die. The runners would literally build up a cake of frost on them. When the weather was warm, they ran okay except for the dead spot caused by the 009 dizzy. I just noticed the OP is in LA so my experience with single carbs in a colder climate might not be so relevant.

Decent original 34 ICT are hard to get, or to expensive to buy professionally rebuilt, it will cost almost as much as a dual full kit
Correct, I have to be in the upper desert, in February to get around that kind of low temp, not a major issue for LA. I know about the ice build up from my 66 Beetle ages ago, It did iced in the summer, the heater exhaust runner was almost clogged
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

2 Pages V  1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 26th September 2024 - 05:32 PM