![]() |
|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
trick-e |
![]()
Post
#21
|
Still Learning ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 117 Joined: 7-July 12 From: Traverse City, MI USA Member No.: 14,644 Region Association: Upper MidWest ![]() ![]() |
Sharp!
I’ve an ivory ‘75 with a ‘73 2.0, same trim blackout. I will definitely be backdating the bumpers now. |
90quattrocoupe |
![]()
Post
#22
|
Member ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 208 Joined: 4-November 16 From: Long Beach, CA. Member No.: 20,561 Region Association: Southern California ![]() |
Thank you, Eric Shea. I bought the car in 1981, after looking at 35 1973 2.0l cars. Something about white cars, I liked. I bought it because it had 45,XXX miles on it. It had the gauges in the interior, but did not have the outside appearance group. I liked the black bumpers and no vinyl on the sails. I added the front fogs later.
I had had 2 friends that had had 914s. One a 6 and the other a1.7l four. I drove the car for 20 years, and then it was basically stored. I had gotten into quattros, but still wanted the 914. Just something different about a small mid-engine car, that nothing else compares to. It even made a trip to Indiana and back to CA. After sitting for all those years, I decided it needed a rebuild. I called Eric and we talked. I liked what I heard and a few months later, I delivered the car to PMB. Over the last few years we have talked, he has always kept me up to date, sending pictures all along the way. It has been a great experience. Somewhere along the way, I must have mentioned that I like black. Eric surprised me one day, with all the trim blacked out. I love it. About 6 months ago we started talking about if we wanted to keep the original FI or did we want to do an update. I figured we needed something a little more modern than something invented in the 1960s. I was familiar with VEMS, as I am running it on my Coupe Quattro. So we updated the FI. Eric is now going to offering a kit for upgrading the FI to something a little more modern. With a bump from 90hp to 112hp, that is a 20% increase in hp, from just a more modern FI. This is with stock valves and a stock cam. I am sure that with larger valves and more cam, it would have more hp. With the newer FI keeping the fueling at the proper ratios, Eric tells me the car runs cool. I want to thank Eric and his whole crew for what they have done to the car. I will be picking it, shortly and going to have some fun on back roads. Greg W. |
pete000 |
![]()
Post
#23
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,885 Joined: 23-August 10 From: Bradenton Florida Member No.: 12,094 Region Association: South East States ![]() |
Nice lobby over there at PMB !
|
mepstein |
![]()
Post
#24
|
914-6 GT in waiting ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 19,334 Joined: 19-September 09 From: Landenberg, PA/Wilmington, DE Member No.: 10,825 Region Association: MidAtlantic Region ![]() ![]() |
Eric - can you talk about the VEMS.
@Eric_Shea |
rgalla9146 |
![]()
Post
#25
|
Advanced Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 4,579 Joined: 23-November 05 From: Paramus NJ Member No.: 5,176 Region Association: None ![]() ![]() |
Light Ivory/black the choice of discerning enthusiasts worldwide. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) Beautiful ! |
DTMLGND |
![]()
Post
#26
|
Newbie ![]() Group: Members Posts: 32 Joined: 6-November 11 From: US Member No.: 13,756 Region Association: Southern California ![]() |
Wow! Speechless. Congrats!! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/aktion035.gif)
|
Freezin 914 |
![]()
Post
#27
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 881 Joined: 27-July 14 From: Wisconsin Member No.: 17,687 Region Association: Upper MidWest ![]() ![]() |
|
jd74914 |
![]()
Post
#28
|
Its alive ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 4,782 Joined: 16-February 04 From: CT Member No.: 1,659 Region Association: North East States ![]() |
Curious here too. Last time I've heard of VEMS was maybe 2007ish when they really were really quite an improvement over Megasquirt and had just gone private from MSAVR. Not much documentation back then. Beautiful car!! The more Ivory cars I see the more I want one! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/drooley.gif) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif) |
Eric_Shea |
![]()
Post
#29
|
PMB Performance ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Admin Posts: 19,279 Joined: 3-September 03 From: Salt Lake City, UT Member No.: 1,110 Region Association: Rocky Mountains ![]() ![]() |
Sorry Guys,
I had a VEMS reply all written out but, I must of got pulled away and lost it. Happens here all the time. VEMS is an offshoot from the original Mega/MicroSquirt team. ALL of the modern FI brains and systems are really more than competent to handle what is required for a Type 4. The competitiveness in the market makes it "very" rich in features and usability. I would compare the VEMS systems we used in these cars to the MegaSquirt. It has an onboard MAP sensor etc so very similar. We went with the VEMS system because Greg is already familiar with it on his Audi. It's an excellent system that is widely regarded in the Audi/BMW realm. As with any and all of these systems, we're probably only tapping into 5-10% of their computing power for our applications. We can no longer trust 50 year old components to effectively monitor and meter fuel to our new engines. That time has come. Say what you will. Preach as you must. We either recommend carbs or modern EFI or we will not offer a warranty on an engine. We've had holes in brand new pistons because of old ineffective components. Strip the copper wires on your 50 year old harness and you'll find them to be a brownish/grey. No longer copper and no longer effectively sending the proper signals to where they need to go. In fact, it's one of my biggest things for old FI... get a new harness then troubleshoot the rest. Again, we're all but done with it. We're developing systems in-house that will be a drop in for all FI 914's using largely stock intake components. The only "user" task will be to get an O2 bung welded on their muffler. As you can see with Greg's car, the engine bay is largely stock and, to the uninitiated, you'd be hard pressed to see what's missing or what's been added. Stock airbox. Stock TB. Stock intake runners. Stock FI rails. MPS missing. WSD/DIS added where the rotor cap was. Bosch TPS added. Air intake temperature sensor added. Wide Band O2 added. All producing 112-115hp on an otherwise stock 2.0 build. Our new systems will have a MicroSquirt brain and again, we'll be tapping (as you MS guys know) 5-10% of their brainpower to do what's needed on our Type 4's. I've spent a tremendous amount of time and money on R&D and trial and error getting these systems to the market and I'm 100% onboard. They are jaw dropping reliable and deliver remarkable gains in horsepower and tune-ability. It makes a stock 2.0 a grin from ear to ear, joy to drive. Putting my money where my mouth is, I've bailed on my personal 3.2 narrow body project and will be going 2.3 ITB EFI (what we call the 2300i package here). Edit: I would also like to add that we feel fortunate to have @JamesM here in our backyard to help push, prod and sarcastically chide us in the proper direction. He was a big help in the early days of us with mapping etc. Thanks James! I hope that helps. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smilie_pokal.gif) |
horizontally-opposed |
![]()
Post
#30
|
Advanced Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3,435 Joined: 12-May 04 From: San Francisco Member No.: 2,058 Region Association: None ![]() ![]() |
Cool article on a cool car—nice to see narrow -4s getting some love!
Ditto for PMB, too. Congrats, all! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/beerchug.gif) |
JamesM |
![]()
Post
#31
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,933 Joined: 6-April 06 From: Kearns, UT Member No.: 5,834 Region Association: Intermountain Region ![]() |
I would also like to add that we feel fortunate to have @JamesM here in our backyard to help push, prod and sarcastically chide us in the proper direction. He was a big help in the early days of us with mapping etc. Thanks James! @Eric_Shea Ahhh... Making me fell all warm and fuzzy inside! Happy that you were able to see the potential and run with it! Its something I have preached for years (like 15 or so now) that a much improved drop in replacement for d-jet that retains a stock like appearance was possible, if not quickly becoming a necessity and that there are gains to be had in the accuracy of a fully programable system. I unfortunately have a day job that limits my ability to feasibly produce/support anything at scale. Jealous you get to spend your days doing all the fun stuff, but glad that you do as this was badly needed! Still blown away at the dyno results, I knew d-jet was leaving power on the table but the end numbers exceeded even what I would have guessed. If anything you have somewhat vindicated me from being the crazy guy always rambling about Megasquirt! The results are real people! Don't think you are done hearing from me either... the experiments on my cars are never ending and ill be sure to let you know how the testing goes, already have some more things to run by you.. offline, don't want to ruin it. Hopefully I am not to rough with the sarcastic chiding though, that was how my family expressed love... it was an 'interesting' childhood. PS. Those braided hoses sure look slick!!! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif) |
Shivers |
![]()
Post
#32
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,490 Joined: 19-October 20 From: La Quinta, CA Member No.: 24,781 Region Association: Southern California ![]() |
"We either recommend carbs or modern EFI or we will not offer a warranty on an engine."
Nice. |
gereed75 |
![]()
Post
#33
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,263 Joined: 19-March 13 From: Pittsburgh PA Member No.: 15,674 Region Association: North East States ![]() ![]() |
Eric or Greg, what paint did you use? Single stage or base/clear and what brand paint code. Love the creamy light ivory.
|
peteyd |
![]()
Post
#34
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 708 Joined: 27-March 08 From: Elora, Ontario, Canada Member No.: 8,858 Region Association: Canada ![]() |
Great looking build Eric!
Pete |
DRPHIL914 |
![]()
Post
#35
|
Dr. Phil ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 5,769 Joined: 9-December 09 From: Bluffton, SC Member No.: 11,106 Region Association: South East States ![]() ![]() |
Sorry Guys, I had a VEMS reply all written out but, I must of got pulled away and lost it. Happens here all the time. VEMS is an offshoot from the original Mega/MicroSquirt team. ALL of the modern FI brains and systems are really more than competent to handle what is required for a Type 4. The competitiveness in the market makes it "very" rich in features and usability. I would compare the VEMS systems we used in these cars to the MegaSquirt. It has an onboard MAP sensor etc so very similar. We went with the VEMS system because Greg is already familiar with it on his Audi. It's an excellent system that is widely regarded in the Audi/BMW realm. As with any and all of these systems, we're probably only tapping into 5-10% of their computing power for our applications. We can no longer trust 50 year old components to effectively monitor and meter fuel to our new engines. That time has come. Say what you will. Preach as you must. We either recommend carbs or modern EFI or we will not offer a warranty on an engine. We've had holes in brand new pistons because of old ineffective components. Strip the copper wires on your 50 year old harness and you'll find them to be a brownish/grey. No longer copper and no longer effectively sending the proper signals to where they need to go. In fact, it's one of my biggest things for old FI... get a new harness then troubleshoot the rest. Again, we're all but done with it. We're developing systems in-house that will be a drop in for all FI 914's using largely stock intake components. The only "user" task will be to get an O2 bung welded on their muffler. As you can see with Greg's car, the engine bay is largely stock and, to the uninitiated, you'd be hard pressed to see what's missing or what's been added. Stock airbox. Stock TB. Stock intake runners. Stock FI rails. MPS missing. WSD/DIS added where the rotor cap was. Bosch TPS added. Air intake temperature sensor added. Wide Band O2 added. All producing 112-115hp on an otherwise stock 2.0 build. Our new systems will have a MicroSquirt brain and again, we'll be tapping (as you MS guys know) 5-10% of their brainpower to do what's needed on our Type 4's. I've spent a tremendous amount of time and money on R&D and trial and error getting these systems to the market and I'm 100% onboard. They are jaw dropping reliable and deliver remarkable gains in horsepower and tune-ability. It makes a stock 2.0 a grin from ear to ear, joy to drive. Putting my money where my mouth is, I've bailed on my personal 3.2 narrow body project and will be going 2.3 ITB EFI (what we call the 2300i package here). Edit: I would also like to add that we feel fortunate to have @JamesM here in our backyard to help push, prod and sarcastically chide us in the proper direction. He was a big help in the early days of us with mapping etc. Thanks James! I hope that helps. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smilie_pokal.gif) this is great news for our 914 community! I am certainly interested and i already have the O2 bung installed on the exhause with the Dakota digital AF meter,. looks like it would be pretty easy to make the change. SInce i already had my throttle body rebuilt, i would keep it but seems like getting a larger bus TB like some guys have done would also help increase air flow,. once you get your price point set let us know where this is going to land i am going to start saving now lol!! BTW beautiful build like everyting else Eric does!!! HOpe to see you at Amelia island, are you coming in may for the Werks Reunion?? Phil |
Eric_Shea |
![]()
Post
#36
|
PMB Performance ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Admin Posts: 19,279 Joined: 3-September 03 From: Salt Lake City, UT Member No.: 1,110 Region Association: Rocky Mountains ![]() ![]() |
Sorry Guys, I had a VEMS reply all written out but, I must of got pulled away and lost it. Happens here all the time. VEMS is an offshoot from the original Mega/MicroSquirt team. ALL of the modern FI brains and systems are really more than competent to handle what is required for a Type 4. The competitiveness in the market makes it "very" rich in features and usability. I would compare the VEMS systems we used in these cars to the MegaSquirt. It has an onboard MAP sensor etc so very similar. We went with the VEMS system because Greg is already familiar with it on his Audi. It's an excellent system that is widely regarded in the Audi/BMW realm. As with any and all of these systems, we're probably only tapping into 5-10% of their computing power for our applications. We can no longer trust 50 year old components to effectively monitor and meter fuel to our new engines. That time has come. Say what you will. Preach as you must. We either recommend carbs or modern EFI or we will not offer a warranty on an engine. We've had holes in brand new pistons because of old ineffective components. Strip the copper wires on your 50 year old harness and you'll find them to be a brownish/grey. No longer copper and no longer effectively sending the proper signals to where they need to go. In fact, it's one of my biggest things for old FI... get a new harness then troubleshoot the rest. Again, we're all but done with it. We're developing systems in-house that will be a drop in for all FI 914's using largely stock intake components. The only "user" task will be to get an O2 bung welded on their muffler. As you can see with Greg's car, the engine bay is largely stock and, to the uninitiated, you'd be hard pressed to see what's missing or what's been added. Stock airbox. Stock TB. Stock intake runners. Stock FI rails. MPS missing. WSD/DIS added where the rotor cap was. Bosch TPS added. Air intake temperature sensor added. Wide Band O2 added. All producing 112-115hp on an otherwise stock 2.0 build. Our new systems will have a MicroSquirt brain and again, we'll be tapping (as you MS guys know) 5-10% of their brainpower to do what's needed on our Type 4's. I've spent a tremendous amount of time and money on R&D and trial and error getting these systems to the market and I'm 100% onboard. They are jaw dropping reliable and deliver remarkable gains in horsepower and tune-ability. It makes a stock 2.0 a grin from ear to ear, joy to drive. Putting my money where my mouth is, I've bailed on my personal 3.2 narrow body project and will be going 2.3 ITB EFI (what we call the 2300i package here). Edit: I would also like to add that we feel fortunate to have @JamesM here in our backyard to help push, prod and sarcastically chide us in the proper direction. He was a big help in the early days of us with mapping etc. Thanks James! I hope that helps. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smilie_pokal.gif) this is great news for our 914 community! I am certainly interested and i already have the O2 bung installed on the exhause with the Dakota digital AF meter,. looks like it would be pretty easy to make the change. SInce i already had my throttle body rebuilt, i would keep it but seems like getting a larger bus TB like some guys have done would also help increase air flow,. once you get your price point set let us know where this is going to land i am going to start saving now lol!! BTW beautiful build like everyting else Eric does!!! HOpe to see you at Amelia island, are you coming in may for the Werks Reunion?? Phil No Amelia this year due to the new shop move. |
DRPHIL914 |
![]()
Post
#37
|
Dr. Phil ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 5,769 Joined: 9-December 09 From: Bluffton, SC Member No.: 11,106 Region Association: South East States ![]() ![]() |
Sorry Guys, I had a VEMS reply all written out but, I must of got pulled away and lost it. Happens here all the time. VEMS is an offshoot from the original Mega/MicroSquirt team. ALL of the modern FI brains and systems are really more than competent to handle what is required for a Type 4. The competitiveness in the market makes it "very" rich in features and usability. I would compare the VEMS systems we used in these cars to the MegaSquirt. It has an onboard MAP sensor etc so very similar. We went with the VEMS system because Greg is already familiar with it on his Audi. It's an excellent system that is widely regarded in the Audi/BMW realm. As with any and all of these systems, we're probably only tapping into 5-10% of their computing power for our applications. We can no longer trust 50 year old components to effectively monitor and meter fuel to our new engines. That time has come. Say what you will. Preach as you must. We either recommend carbs or modern EFI or we will not offer a warranty on an engine. We've had holes in brand new pistons because of old ineffective components. Strip the copper wires on your 50 year old harness and you'll find them to be a brownish/grey. No longer copper and no longer effectively sending the proper signals to where they need to go. In fact, it's one of my biggest things for old FI... get a new harness then troubleshoot the rest. Again, we're all but done with it. We're developing systems in-house that will be a drop in for all FI 914's using largely stock intake components. The only "user" task will be to get an O2 bung welded on their muffler. As you can see with Greg's car, the engine bay is largely stock and, to the uninitiated, you'd be hard pressed to see what's missing or what's been added. Stock airbox. Stock TB. Stock intake runners. Stock FI rails. MPS missing. WSD/DIS added where the rotor cap was. Bosch TPS added. Air intake temperature sensor added. Wide Band O2 added. All producing 112-115hp on an otherwise stock 2.0 build. Our new systems will have a MicroSquirt brain and again, we'll be tapping (as you MS guys know) 5-10% of their brainpower to do what's needed on our Type 4's. I've spent a tremendous amount of time and money on R&D and trial and error getting these systems to the market and I'm 100% onboard. They are jaw dropping reliable and deliver remarkable gains in horsepower and tune-ability. It makes a stock 2.0 a grin from ear to ear, joy to drive. Putting my money where my mouth is, I've bailed on my personal 3.2 narrow body project and will be going 2.3 ITB EFI (what we call the 2300i package here). Edit: I would also like to add that we feel fortunate to have @JamesM here in our backyard to help push, prod and sarcastically chide us in the proper direction. He was a big help in the early days of us with mapping etc. Thanks James! I hope that helps. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smilie_pokal.gif) this is great news for our 914 community! I am certainly interested and i already have the O2 bung installed on the exhause with the Dakota digital AF meter,. looks like it would be pretty easy to make the change. SInce i already had my throttle body rebuilt, i would keep it but seems like getting a larger bus TB like some guys have done would also help increase air flow,. once you get your price point set let us know where this is going to land i am going to start saving now lol!! BTW beautiful build like everyting else Eric does!!! HOpe to see you at Amelia island, are you coming in may for the Werks Reunion?? Phil No Amelia this year due to the new shop move. sorry you wont be making the trip but fully understand with the move and all, but maybe next year,. maybe in 2022 you could have a display of some of these wonderful cars and also the VEMS system- i hope to have one in place by then. |
914_7T3 |
![]()
Post
#38
|
Please forgive me, I'm new to all of this! ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,854 Joined: 3-April 17 From: Los Angeles, CA Member No.: 20,991 Region Association: Southern California ![]() ![]() |
Just seeing this thread for the first time, WOW (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wub.gif)
Congratulations to @90quattrocoupe on this beautiful car! Great work from @eric_shea as always! Hope to see you out in the Twistys of SoCal (IMG:style_emoticons/default/driving.gif) |
Root_Werks |
![]()
Post
#39
|
Village Idiot ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 8,341 Joined: 25-May 04 From: About 5NM from Canada Member No.: 2,105 Region Association: Pacific Northwest ![]() ![]() |
Sure turned out nice, great work!
|
Gint |
![]()
Post
#40
|
Mike Ginter ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Admin Posts: 16,086 Joined: 26-December 02 From: Denver CO. Member No.: 20 Region Association: Rocky Mountains ![]() ![]() |
Good grief that's gorgeous! Fantastic work to all involved.
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 26th June 2024 - 12:45 AM |
All rights reserved 914World.com © since 2002 |
914World.com is the fastest growing online 914 community! We have it all, classifieds, events, forums, vendors, parts, autocross, racing, technical articles, events calendar, newsletter, restoration, gallery, archives, history and more for your Porsche 914 ... |