Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

6 Pages V « < 4 5 6  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> 123 Install Today - GETTING CLOSER..., PROGRESS: BAD MPS
technicalninja
post Apr 28 2024, 10:00 AM
Post #101


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,827
Joined: 31-January 23
From: Granbury Texas
Member No.: 27,135
Region Association: Southwest Region



Started another thread regarding possible backfire protection of the MPS.
Didn't want to clutter up your thread.
Rick
http://www.914world.com/bbs2/index.php?showtopic=370118
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
FlacaProductions
post Apr 28 2024, 02:05 PM
Post #102


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,733
Joined: 24-November 17
From: LA
Member No.: 21,628
Region Association: Southern California



I appreciate that - and I'll test the "old" one asap to confirm but it has clearly been opened whereas the new one is the correct model and has not been opened.

The difference as been night and day.

Just went for two quick rides and the head temps stayed in check (floating around 350ish depending on load, etc) and oil was at 210.
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
FlacaProductions
post Apr 29 2024, 07:48 AM
Post #103


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,733
Joined: 24-November 17
From: LA
Member No.: 21,628
Region Association: Southern California



Update on my MPS testing: holds 15lbs of vac for 30 mins - so that checks out - and I got 95 ohms across 7 and 15 and 345 ohms across 8 and 10. So that checks out.

But the fact remains that swapping in the "new" one and it runs great.
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Superhawk996
post Apr 29 2024, 08:43 AM
Post #104


914 Guru
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 6,469
Joined: 25-August 18
From: Woods of N. Idaho
Member No.: 22,428
Region Association: Galt's Gulch



QUOTE(FlacaProductions @ Apr 29 2024, 09:48 AM) *

Update on my MPS testing: holds 15lbs of vac for 30 mins - so that checks out - and I got 95 ohms across 7 and 15 and 345 ohms across 8 and 10. So that checks out.

But the fact remains that swapping in the "new" one and it runs great.

I’m going to put this post from the other thread here. This pretty much mirrors your situation where it holds vacuum but doesn’t respond properly.

Long ago when working on friends car, I used to run into the situation where a MPS wouldn’t work and we simply swapped them back when parts were plentiful (late 80s - early 90s). This was long before the availability of replacement diaphragms and affordable LCR testers.

Let us know what you find when you get around to MPS tear down.

QUOTE(ChrisFoley @ Apr 28 2024, 05:28 PM) *

QUOTE(Superhawk996 @ Apr 28 2024, 11:33 AM) *


That metal diaphragm isn’t terribly sensitive to backfire but I have no doubt that if you have one that’s already fatigued and has a hair line crack (but holding vacuum), a backfire could finish it off and crack it.


^^^
This

I've rebuilt many units which held vacuum ok but didn't perform well in use. The diaphragm was always cracked already when I disassembled them.
The diaphragm is under spring pressure when the engine is not running and while at WOT. The perimeter support surface has a sharp corner that creates the fatigue which eventually cracks the diaphragm.
A sudden transition to positive pressure could be the last straw.
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

6 Pages V « < 4 5 6
Reply to this topicStart new topic
5 User(s) are reading this topic (5 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 19th September 2024 - 10:40 AM