Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> 914World Classifieds Rules

We've established the following rules to help make your sales/purchases as successful as possible!
- Please List WTB:, FS:, TRADE: etc (want to buy, for sale, and trade respectively) before your add title.
- You *must* put a price in your ad and state how you would like payment!
- If you'd like to bump your ads, feel free to do so every two days.
- DO NOT MAKE YOUR ADS IN ALL CAPITAL LETTERS! It's considered rude.
- All eBay ads belong in the eBay category.
- Please consolidate your ads into one big lump... listings and pictures together in one thread. Please be considerate of other classified users!!
- Mark your items "SOLD" once you sell them. Please do not ask to have ads removed. Ads will automatically hide themselves after 30 days. We also ask that you leave your pricing in the ads to help others determine fair market value for future sales.

2 Pages V < 1 2  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> WTB front fuel line bulkhead grommet, misplaced mine
rgalla9146
post Feb 9 2025, 09:45 AM
Post #21


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,721
Joined: 23-November 05
From: Paramus NJ
Member No.: 5,176
Region Association: None



QUOTE(aturboman @ Feb 7 2025, 02:28 PM) *

Its the same grommet used for the plastic brake pipes VW# 111 957 861

I don't believe it changed to the large single grommet until late 74 possibly 75 when the pump got moved up front.

This is on an early 914-6 for reference




1970 914 6 2567
Unmolested 914 6 two grommets
I can't imagine there would be a difference between 4 and 6 cyl. in this area.
I've seen something in two original 6 cars that would be unthinkable today.
NO hose clamps
As seen in this photo and observed in 914 6 # 1467 I owned both cars and was the
first to remove the gas tank in both cars.
Also, amazingly no hose clamps at the fuel pump connections either.


Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
mepstein
post Feb 9 2025, 10:19 AM
Post #22


914-6 GT in waiting
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 19,786
Joined: 19-September 09
From: Landenberg, PA/Wilmington, DE
Member No.: 10,825
Region Association: MidAtlantic Region



WOW!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
rgalla9146
post Feb 9 2025, 10:50 AM
Post #23


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,721
Joined: 23-November 05
From: Paramus NJ
Member No.: 5,176
Region Association: None




fuel pump hoses as found.
Sorry for adding this to the WTB but the topic had already detoured to originality


Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
zoomCat
post Feb 9 2025, 02:14 PM
Post #24


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 197
Joined: 13-August 04
From: Cincinnati, OH
Member No.: 2,526
Region Association: None



I was searching through my boxes of salvage looking for this. My car is a six, and the PET shows it using the late grommet with the two holes. I thought I’d lost it. Looking at the bulkhead under the tank it clearly has the two smaller holes, so the PET is wrong.

I really appreciate this thread, I could have gone down a rabbit hole on this one.

Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
rgalla9146
post Feb 9 2025, 04:00 PM
Post #25


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,721
Joined: 23-November 05
From: Paramus NJ
Member No.: 5,176
Region Association: None



QUOTE(zoomCat @ Feb 9 2025, 03:14 PM) *

I was searching through my boxes of salvage looking for this. My car is a six, and the PET shows it using the late grommet with the two holes. I thought I’d lost it. Looking at the bulkhead under the tank it clearly has the two smaller holes, so the PET is wrong.

I really appreciate this thread, I could have gone down a rabbit hole on this one.

Attached Image


Hey Guy
The parts diagram shown appears to be a bit of a composite.
The upper section is clearly 914 6 with no fuel filter and no return from the carbs but
curiously shows the double grommit up front.
What it does appear to show is no hose clamps (on a 6) except after the pump to the
carbs.
I do not recommend this, it is just an observation and very curious.
Rory
rgalla9146@aol.com
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
rgalla9146
post Feb 9 2025, 05:07 PM
Post #26


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,721
Joined: 23-November 05
From: Paramus NJ
Member No.: 5,176
Region Association: None




the other example 914 043 1467


Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
zoomCat
post Feb 10 2025, 10:23 AM
Post #27


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 197
Joined: 13-August 04
From: Cincinnati, OH
Member No.: 2,526
Region Association: None



QUOTE(rgalla9146 @ Feb 9 2025, 06:07 PM) *

the other example 914 043 1467

The factory used 7 and 9 mm hose over 8 and 10 mm fittings, the hose stretched considerably and was a pretty tight fit. They didn’t appear to feel the need for hose clamps on unpressurized lines as we’ve seen here, and I am not aware of it ever being a problem.

I’m putting hose clamps on everything, though. Originality be damned.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
rgalla9146
post Feb 10 2025, 09:09 PM
Post #28


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,721
Joined: 23-November 05
From: Paramus NJ
Member No.: 5,176
Region Association: None



QUOTE(zoomCat @ Feb 10 2025, 11:23 AM) *

QUOTE(rgalla9146 @ Feb 9 2025, 06:07 PM) *

the other example 914 043 1467

The factory used 7 and 9 mm hose over 8 and 10 mm fittings, the hose stretched considerably and was a pretty tight fit. They didn’t appear to feel the need for hose clamps on unpressurized lines as we’ve seen here, and I am not aware of it ever being a problem.

I’m putting hose clamps on everything, though. Originality be damned.


No pressure.
As I said, it would be unthinkable today.

Just as an aside, both cars were track driven early in California and serviced by
well known shops, one by Roger Bursch of exhaust fame and the other by
Vasek Polak
I put both of them back in running condition after many years dormant.


Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

2 Pages V < 1 2
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 14th March 2025 - 07:17 AM