|
|

|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
|
![]() ![]() |
| StarBear |
Feb 19 2026, 07:40 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Advanced Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,233 Joined: 2-September 09 From: NJ Member No.: 10,753 Region Association: North East States
|
Thinking of doing a refresh of my front shocks and rear shocks/springs. All are very old though function fine. Sure I’ll see improvements in corners and ride.
Thinking of Bilsteins. Any suggested best choices? (IMG:style_emoticons/default/confused24.gif) 74 1.8L Very stock. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif) Just local drives and some hill curves; no track or auto cross. |
| L-Jet914 |
Feb 19 2026, 09:40 PM
Post
#2
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 379 Joined: 24-October 12 From: Davis, CA Member No.: 15,080 Region Association: Northern California |
Thinking of doing a refresh of my front shocks and rear shocks/springs. All are very old though function fine. Sure I’ll see improvements in corners and ride. Thinking of Bilsteins. Any suggested best choices? (IMG:style_emoticons/default/confused24.gif) 74 1.8L Very stock. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif) Just local drives and some hill curves; no track or auto cross. I replaced what was in my 914 with Bilsteins front strut inserts and rear shocks. Or you could go with the AA route where they had shock absorbers made close to the factory spec Boge shock. I decided to go with the 914Rubber rear springs. |
| wonkipop |
Feb 19 2026, 11:47 PM
Post
#3
|
|
914 Guru ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 5,405 Joined: 6-May 20 From: north antarctica Member No.: 24,231 Region Association: NineFourteenerVille
|
Thinking of doing a refresh of my front shocks and rear shocks/springs. All are very old though function fine. Sure I’ll see improvements in corners and ride. Thinking of Bilsteins. Any suggested best choices? (IMG:style_emoticons/default/confused24.gif) 74 1.8L Very stock. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif) Just local drives and some hill curves; no track or auto cross. i did the softest spec bilsteins front and rear. they are noticeably firmer. but i have tall boy XAS reissue tyres to take some of the sting out of them. not complaining. inserts at front. full units at rear. what i found was the step rings in the rear shocks do not exactly co-incide with the single spring perch in the original boges. you have to go slightly higher or slightly lower at rear as a result. then level the car out with front adjustment. i know some folks go lower at front. but i set mine up level. |
| sixaddict |
Feb 20 2026, 07:21 AM
Post
#4
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,034 Joined: 22-January 09 From: Panama City Beach, FL Member No.: 9,961 Region Association: South East States
|
On rear springs…..stock is 90lb which makes car sit a little high. 100lb drops it a little and gives a little better handling without sacrificing ride quality. Several sources but make sure they have inventory. BTW…….Havent installed yet so this is result of extensive search/opinions.
Caveat: this is opinion of poster and does not reflect that of staff or management (IMG:style_emoticons/default/dry.gif) |
| JamesM |
Feb 20 2026, 08:29 AM
Post
#5
|
|
Advanced Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,181 Joined: 6-April 06 From: Kearns, UT Member No.: 5,834 Region Association: Intermountain Region |
On rear springs…..stock is 90lb which makes car sit a little high. 100lb drops it a little and gives a little better handling without sacrificing ride quality. Several sources but make sure they have inventory. BTW…….Havent installed yet so this is result of extensive search/opinions. Caveat: this is opinion of poster and does not reflect that of staff or management (IMG:style_emoticons/default/dry.gif) Stock is a lot less than 90lbs/in for all the road cars. According to documentation I have -4s were 52-55lbs/in depending on part number -6s were 58-62 6 GTs were 70, 80, or 90 at the stiffest. So 100s are 10% stiffer than the stiffest spring Porsche ran on GTs. But for some reason people still throw 225lb springs in the back cuz they are smarter than the Porsche engineers who won LeMans. |
| StarBear |
Feb 20 2026, 08:40 AM
Post
#6
|
|
Advanced Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,233 Joined: 2-September 09 From: NJ Member No.: 10,753 Region Association: North East States
|
Thinking of doing a refresh of my front shocks and rear shocks/springs. All are very old though function fine. Sure I’ll see improvements in corners and ride. Thinking of Bilsteins. Any suggested best choices? (IMG:style_emoticons/default/confused24.gif) 74 1.8L Very stock. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif) Just local drives and some hill curves; no track or auto cross. I replaced what was in my 914 with Bilsteins front strut inserts and rear shocks. Or you could go with the AA route where they had shock absorbers made close to the factory spec Boge shock. I decided to go with the 914Rubber rear springs. @L-Jet914 What spec/model Bilsteins would that be? |
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 20th February 2026 - 09:49 AM |
| All rights reserved 914World.com © since 2002 |
|
914World.com is the fastest growing online 914 community! We have it all, classifieds, events, forums, vendors, parts, autocross, racing, technical articles, events calendar, newsletter, restoration, gallery, archives, history and more for your Porsche 914 ... |