Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

14 Pages V « < 4 5 6 7 8 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> PMS bar mount failure, the picture
siverson
post Apr 25 2006, 10:53 AM
Post #101


Advanced Member
****

Group: Benefactors
Posts: 2,448
Joined: 5-May 03
From: San Diego, CA
Member No.: 654
Region Association: Southern California



914


Attached image(s)
Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
siverson
post Apr 25 2006, 10:53 AM
Post #102


Advanced Member
****

Group: Benefactors
Posts: 2,448
Joined: 5-May 03
From: San Diego, CA
Member No.: 654
Region Association: Southern California



914


Attached image(s)
Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Aaron Cox
post Apr 25 2006, 10:54 AM
Post #103


Professional Lawn Dart
***************

Group: Retired Admin
Posts: 24,541
Joined: 1-February 03
From: OC
Member No.: 219
Region Association: Southern California



(IMG:style_emoticons/default/chowtime.gif) roasted P. Motorsports (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
siverson
post Apr 25 2006, 10:54 AM
Post #104


Advanced Member
****

Group: Benefactors
Posts: 2,448
Joined: 5-May 03
From: San Diego, CA
Member No.: 654
Region Association: Southern California



914


Attached image(s)
Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
siverson
post Apr 25 2006, 10:57 AM
Post #105


Advanced Member
****

Group: Benefactors
Posts: 2,448
Joined: 5-May 03
From: San Diego, CA
Member No.: 654
Region Association: Southern California



He refused to replace it under warranty or offer any sort of credit so it was the last part I've bought from him (after having spent $000s there).

You guys should all really use a bulkhead mount. It's the only way to do it right and the Rich Johnson mount is awesome.

-Steve
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Rand
post Apr 25 2006, 11:04 AM
Post #106


Cross Member
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 7,409
Joined: 8-February 05
From: OR
Member No.: 3,573
Region Association: None



Wow. It's clear in those photos that welding problems are only part of the picture. That failure is an engineering flaw.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Trekkor
post Apr 25 2006, 11:06 AM
Post #107


I do things...
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 7,809
Joined: 2-December 03
From: Napa, Ca
Member No.: 1,413
Region Association: Northern California



PMS's wall mount uses the same cradle mounting flange as the bar mount

Those last pics really burn me up.


KT
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Cap'n Krusty
post Apr 25 2006, 11:09 AM
Post #108


Cap'n Krusty
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 10,794
Joined: 24-June 04
From: Santa Maria, CA
Member No.: 2,246
Region Association: Central California



He's still selling them because there are people still willing to buy them. There are ALWAYS people looking for a shortcut, and are unaware of the pitfalls therein. The Cap'n
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Trekkor
post Apr 25 2006, 11:12 AM
Post #109


I do things...
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 7,809
Joined: 2-December 03
From: Napa, Ca
Member No.: 1,413
Region Association: Northern California



What to do, what to do?

KT
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Rand
post Apr 25 2006, 11:16 AM
Post #110


Cross Member
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 7,409
Joined: 8-February 05
From: OR
Member No.: 3,573
Region Association: None



http://www.914conversions.com/html/mount.html
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
grantsfo
post Apr 25 2006, 11:25 AM
Post #111


Arrrrhhhh!
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,327
Joined: 16-March 03
Member No.: 433
Region Association: None



QUOTE(trekkor @ Apr 25 2006, 10:06 AM) *

PMS's wall mount uses the same cradle mounting flange as the bar mount

Those last pics really burn me up.


KT


If anything I would think that PMS wall mount would be more prone to having failure due to it being more rigid than the bar and same engine mounting flange as the bar.

So are you still thinking of fixing the bar or going to a new mount?

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
fiid
post Apr 25 2006, 11:26 AM
Post #112


Turbo Megasquirted Subaru Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,827
Joined: 7-April 03
From: San Francisco, CA
Member No.: 530
Region Association: Northern California



QUOTE(Dan (Almaden Valley) @ Apr 24 2006, 02:54 PM) *

And how was it again, that the factory 6 engine mount was attached???? (IMG:style_emoticons/default/dry.gif)

What was that, did someone say bulkhead? (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)


I think Trekkor has heard that by now; have you read the rest of the threads? Talk about (IMG:style_emoticons/default/dead horse.gif)


I didn't realise (didn't spend much time thinking about it (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) ) that the quick-6 bars had to come so far forward to mount to the motor. We have the same problems with the subaru mountings because the subaru engine mounts are at the back of the motor - causing the same problem in the other direction.

It's impossible to even make it work without additional support on the subie motor because the distance is even further away from the stock bar location than it is with a quick six, and the subie motor only has two mount bolts - so there's no resistance to the flex. I tried this setup and the motor could bounce about 4-5 inches. Because I have removed a good portion of my trunk floor I was able to catch this by standing on the tranny and bouncing up and down to check the strengh of the mount - which is not possible with a regular 6 or 4 setup.





User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Trekkor
post Apr 25 2006, 11:27 AM
Post #113


I do things...
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 7,809
Joined: 2-December 03
From: Napa, Ca
Member No.: 1,413
Region Association: Northern California



Thanks for the link.

I am thinking of a way to prevent the bar from moving foward and thus rotating downward.

If I can fab up a bracket that would be attatched to the firewall so the bar would be stabilized, I may be able to continue.


KT
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Aaron Cox
post Apr 25 2006, 11:29 AM
Post #114


Professional Lawn Dart
***************

Group: Retired Admin
Posts: 24,541
Joined: 1-February 03
From: OC
Member No.: 219
Region Association: Southern California



QUOTE(trekkor @ Apr 25 2006, 10:12 AM) *

What to do, what to do?

KT


RJ mount (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
brant
post Apr 25 2006, 11:35 AM
Post #115


914 Wizard
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 11,647
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Colorado
Member No.: 47
Region Association: Rocky Mountains



[/quote]
If anything I would think that PMS wall mount would be more prone to having failure due to it being more rigid than the bar and same engine mounting flange as the bar.
[/quote]


I don't know...
the wall mount is under different forces.
the bar going forward and flexing up/down is a very very different force

brant
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Aaron Cox
post Apr 25 2006, 11:36 AM
Post #116


Professional Lawn Dart
***************

Group: Retired Admin
Posts: 24,541
Joined: 1-February 03
From: OC
Member No.: 219
Region Association: Southern California



[quote name='brant' date='Apr 25 2006, 10:35 AM' post='667367']
[/quote]
If anything I would think that PMS wall mount would be more prone to having failure due to it being more rigid than the bar and same engine mounting flange as the bar.
[/quote]


I don't know...
the wall mount is under different forces.
the bar going forward and flexing up/down is a very very different force

brant
[/quote]


and it has bushings to take up some of the forces.....
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
fiid
post Apr 25 2006, 11:36 AM
Post #117


Turbo Megasquirted Subaru Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,827
Joined: 7-April 03
From: San Francisco, CA
Member No.: 530
Region Association: Northern California



The pictures of the Patrick bar illustrate IMHO that it's a pretty crappy design - it puts a lot of force on one section of the bar in torsion... It seems like there is little or no triangulation of this on particular section.

I've tried to illustrate this:




Attached image(s)
Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
fiid
post Apr 25 2006, 11:42 AM
Post #118


Turbo Megasquirted Subaru Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,827
Joined: 7-April 03
From: San Francisco, CA
Member No.: 530
Region Association: Northern California



Hmm - this problem looks similar!

(IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/uploads/post-2-1097163489.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
SirAndy
post Apr 25 2006, 11:43 AM
Post #119


Resident German
*************************

Group: Admin
Posts: 41,717
Joined: 21-January 03
From: Oakland, Kalifornia
Member No.: 179
Region Association: Northern California



i know i'm beating a (IMG:style_emoticons/default/dead horse.gif) and grant already hates me, but trek, common, you spent more on GAS to get to the track and back in one weekend than it would cost you to get the Rich Johnson Bulkhead mount.

the RJ mount is extremely sturdy and even allows for two 911 sport mounts to relieve some of that force.

all i ask is that you *think* about it ...
(IMG:style_emoticons/default/beerchug.gif) Andy

http://www.914conversions.com/html/mount.html
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Aaron Cox
post Apr 25 2006, 11:44 AM
Post #120


Professional Lawn Dart
***************

Group: Retired Admin
Posts: 24,541
Joined: 1-February 03
From: OC
Member No.: 219
Region Association: Southern California



QUOTE(SirAndy @ Apr 25 2006, 10:43 AM) *

i know i'm beating a (IMG:style_emoticons/default/dead horse.gif) and grant already hates me, but trek, common, you spent more on GAS to get to the track and back in one weekend than it would cost you to get the Rich Johnson Bulkhead mount.

the RJ mount is extremely sturdy and even allows for two 911 sport mounts to relieve some of that force.

all i ask is that you *think* about it ...
(IMG:style_emoticons/default/beerchug.gif) Andy



(IMG:style_emoticons/default/agree.gif) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/pray.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

14 Pages V « < 4 5 6 7 8 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 5th July 2024 - 03:28 PM