Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Weber Progressive 1.7 lag question
Stuie
post Aug 20 2006, 03:55 PM
Post #1


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 73
Joined: 19-August 06
From: Arlington, Texas
Member No.: 6,688



I have a '70 1.7L with a single Weber 2bbl.

My Pop has a screamin car which smokes the tires in 2nd or 3rd immidiately when the pedal is depressed and was a 1.8L once but is bigger now with dual Dell's.

I know this engine is not gonna do that but, I feel the time lag between gas pedal to response is too long on this engine. My guess is the intake manifold tube length is resposible for the lag. Does that sound right? Is it the way it is supposed to be or could there be something out of tune?

Right now I am just looking for a crisp response, the power mods will be later when I can afford it. Is the dual carb setup quicker reaction? If that's the issue, which size duals would work with the 1.7L I have now and whatever the engine can be upgraded to later and still work well?

Appreciate the advice!

Stu
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
So.Cal.914
post Aug 20 2006, 04:03 PM
Post #2


"...And it has a front trunk too."
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 6,588
Joined: 15-February 04
From: Low Desert, CA./ Hills of N.J.
Member No.: 1,658
Region Association: None



Duel webers are expensive so I think the Q would be how big do you plan to

build your engine. 40's or 44's are to big IMO for a 1.7, you might want to just

do a tune-up and run what you have until you can build the engine you want

and get your carbs then.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Joe Bob
post Aug 20 2006, 04:30 PM
Post #3


Retired admin, banned a few times
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 17,427
Joined: 24-December 02
From: Boulder CO
Member No.: 5
Region Association: None



The single Pinto/Weber progressive is at best a boat anchor....better yet, get five of them, do the world a favor...... sink them all.....
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Eric_Shea
post Aug 20 2006, 04:31 PM
Post #4


PMB Performance
***************

Group: Admin
Posts: 19,289
Joined: 3-September 03
From: Salt Lake City, UT
Member No.: 1,110
Region Association: Rocky Mountains



Cam (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wink.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
SirAndy
post Aug 20 2006, 04:35 PM
Post #5


Resident German
*************************

Group: Admin
Posts: 41,943
Joined: 21-January 03
From: Oakland, Kalifornia
Member No.: 179
Region Association: Northern California



QUOTE(Stuie @ Aug 20 2006, 02:55 PM) *

I have a '70 1.7L with a single Weber 2bbl.


the single carbs were about the worst aftermarket "upgrade" that was ever sold for the 914 ...

those motors were never intended to be run by a single carb and tuning them even close to "right" is a nightmare.
that is, even in "prefect" condition of all parts involved ...

whoever slapped that "upgrade" onto your car needs to be (IMG:style_emoticons/default/dead horse.gif)


now, that we got that out of the way, i suggest you drive it the way it is until you have the means to upgrade to a set of dual webers or go back to the original d-jet or tinker with an aftermarket FI-system ...
(IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) Andy
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Al Meredith
post Aug 20 2006, 06:28 PM
Post #6


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 969
Joined: 4-November 04
From: Atlanta, ga
Member No.: 3,061



A lot of 32/36 Webers were jetted for VW's. Some packed a bigger Idle jet in the box for use with a 914. Try using a .055 idle jet, you will get much better "off idle " responce.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Joe Bob
post Aug 20 2006, 06:34 PM
Post #7


Retired admin, banned a few times
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 17,427
Joined: 24-December 02
From: Boulder CO
Member No.: 5
Region Association: None



Whoever first suggested this "upgrade" should be taken out and shot....

Betya it was Dr. 914....what a putz.....
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mueller
post Aug 20 2006, 06:39 PM
Post #8


914 Freak!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 17,150
Joined: 4-January 03
From: Antioch, CA
Member No.: 87
Region Association: None



QUOTE(Stuie @ Aug 20 2006, 02:55 PM) *

My guess is the intake manifold tube length is resposible for the lag. Does that sound right?

bingo, we have winner !!! ....yes, you are 100% correct, the distance the air/fuel mixture has to travel is pretty long, that and combined with the curves it has to deal with, it gets even worse

Is it the way it is supposed to be or could there be something out of tune?

not much you can do about it

Is the dual carb setup quicker reaction? If that's the issue, which size duals would work with the 1.7L I

duals will always be quicker since the air/fuel has less distance to travel and is less likely to have the fuel come out of suspension and stick to the walls...40s seem to be a popular size.


User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Joe Ricard
post Aug 20 2006, 06:39 PM
Post #9


CUMONIWANNARACEU
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 6,811
Joined: 5-January 03
From: Gautier, MS
Member No.: 92



I can't add anything more to what's already been said.

If you had to run up the street breathing through a straw you would have a lagg too.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
bd1308
post Aug 20 2006, 06:41 PM
Post #10


Sir Post-a-lot
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 8,020
Joined: 24-January 05
From: Louisville,KY
Member No.: 3,501



weber 40s might be a tad too big for a 1.7...

I dunno
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Stuie
post Aug 20 2006, 08:06 PM
Post #11


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 73
Joined: 19-August 06
From: Arlington, Texas
Member No.: 6,688



All of you guys kick arse!

I sincerely appreciate the time you guys are taking to reply to my questions. I can't thank you enough. I sold a 2000 Jeep on Monday to get my house foundation fixed (Dry spell in Dallas tearing 'em up this year) and planned to get a VW bug/bus beater for about $1500 and ran across this 914.

I learned to drive in a 914 so I couldn't have been any luckier to find it! Being, I sold my dependable cage and got the Porsche for my daily, I thank you guys for the advice so I can handle the issues as quickly as possible. Hope to be able to return the favor sometime...

All best
Stu
www.antstuie.com
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 26th December 2024 - 06:53 AM