Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

3 Pages V  1 2 3 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Compression test values for a rebuilt TIV
Dr Evil
post Aug 22 2006, 08:37 AM
Post #1


Send me your transmission!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 23,034
Joined: 21-November 03
From: Loveland, OH 45140
Member No.: 1,372
Region Association: MidAtlantic Region



I have someone offering a friend a "reacently rebuilt" TIV engine and two things stick out to me that give me pause.

1) The current owner claims that the engine was reacently rebuilt, but does not know what size it is. He "thinks" is a 2.0. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/WTF.gif)

2) Claims 110psi more or less on all cylinders. Sounds low to me for new rings and honed cylinders. I am assuming that they are run in, though.


Waht are your thoughts? What values would you expect form a reacent rebuilt?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
bondo
post Aug 22 2006, 08:41 AM
Post #2


Practicing my perpendicular parking
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,277
Joined: 19-April 03
From: Los Osos, CA
Member No.: 587
Region Association: Central California



Low compression bus pistons? You might be able to tell through a sparkplug hole.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
ptravnic
post Aug 22 2006, 09:03 AM
Post #3


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,231
Joined: 27-May 03
From: Chicago, IL
Member No.: 747
Region Association: None



Dr - I just spoke w/Rich and said the same thing that 110psi seemed a bit low but the Hayne's manual should have a rating on this.

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Dr Evil
post Aug 22 2006, 11:08 AM
Post #4


Send me your transmission!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 23,034
Joined: 21-November 03
From: Loveland, OH 45140
Member No.: 1,372
Region Association: MidAtlantic Region



Probably, I am in class right now so no manual here.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
mihai914
post Aug 22 2006, 11:17 AM
Post #5


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 800
Joined: 2-March 05
From: Montreal, QC
Member No.: 3,697
Region Association: None



Last time I did a compression check on my 2.0 I had readings in the 150-160 range. I still don't know what is inside the engine exactly but it looks mostly like everything is stock. The intake runners are so free of carbon it makes me think that the engine was rebuilt not long before the car sat for 15 years. HTH
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Dr Evil
post Aug 22 2006, 11:51 AM
Post #6


Send me your transmission!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 23,034
Joined: 21-November 03
From: Loveland, OH 45140
Member No.: 1,372
Region Association: MidAtlantic Region



Thanks man, those are the numbers I told him. I was pretty sure but wanted a second, third oppinion.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
bd1308
post Aug 22 2006, 12:51 PM
Post #7


Sir Post-a-lot
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 8,020
Joined: 24-January 05
From: Louisville,KY
Member No.: 3,501



I heard 160 from my bus buddies.

Im thinking its less than new.

b
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Aaron Cox
post Aug 22 2006, 01:09 PM
Post #8


Professional Lawn Dart
***************

Group: Retired Admin
Posts: 24,541
Joined: 1-February 03
From: OC
Member No.: 219
Region Association: Southern California



QUOTE(mihai914 @ Aug 22 2006, 10:17 AM) *

Last time I did a compression check on my 2.0 I had readings in the 150-160 range. I still don't know what is inside the engine exactly but it looks mostly like everything is stock. The intake runners are so free of carbon it makes me think that the engine was rebuilt not long before the car sat for 15 years. HTH


the intake runners would get carbon how?

combustion takes place inside the head, and fuel is only intorduced into the runners at the very end (Injector points at the valve) so only air is flowing thru them.... not a source of carbon (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Engman
post Aug 22 2006, 01:09 PM
Post #9


Zoisite
***

Group: Benefactors
Posts: 1,349
Joined: 25-March 03
From: New Albany, IN
Member No.: 475



110 = low

you might look at it - depending on the price.

Something donna feel right.

M
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
nycchef
post Aug 22 2006, 01:25 PM
Post #10


mechanical moron
***

Group: Members
Posts: 952
Joined: 28-November 05
From: new york city n.y.
Member No.: 5,202
Region Association: None



allow me to introduce myself. i am the unamed friend of dr. evil who was looking at the wierd type four with low compression or bus pistons or what the hell. i'll let it go. will rebuild my 1.7 but you guys are suffer through it with me. now let's begin. pete do you want to sell your extra 1.8 heads.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
rjames
post Aug 22 2006, 01:29 PM
Post #11


I'm made of metal
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,158
Joined: 24-July 05
From: Shoreline, WA
Member No.: 4,467
Region Association: Pacific Northwest



(IMG:style_emoticons/default/agree.gif)
QUOTE
Last time I did a compression check on my 2.0 I had readings in the 150-160 range.


That's where my 2 liter was after the PO did a rebuild.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
SirAndy
post Aug 22 2006, 01:34 PM
Post #12


Resident German
*************************

Group: Admin
Posts: 41,943
Joined: 21-January 03
From: Oakland, Kalifornia
Member No.: 179
Region Association: Northern California



QUOTE(mihai914 @ Aug 22 2006, 10:17 AM) *

Last time I did a compression check on my 2.0 I had readings in the 150-160 range.


(IMG:style_emoticons/default/agree.gif) my 2056 had between 155 and 165 ...

(IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) Andy
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Engman
post Aug 22 2006, 01:36 PM
Post #13


Zoisite
***

Group: Benefactors
Posts: 1,349
Joined: 25-March 03
From: New Albany, IN
Member No.: 475



QUOTE(nycchef @ Aug 22 2006, 03:25 PM) *

allow me to introduce myself. i am the unamed friend of dr. evil who was looking at the wierd type four with low compression or bus pistons or what the hell. i'll let it go. will rebuild my 1.7 but you guys are suffer through it with me. now let's begin. pete do you want to sell your extra 1.8 heads.



It all depends upon the price. Look at it and see if

1. 2.0 heads
2. condition of case

It could be a better candidate for rebuild than the 1.7/1.8.

I bought a 2.0 engine that rotated w tranny and exhast for $300 a couple of years ago.

Turns out that one head had a piston missing chunks and needed a complete rebuild. But I got the tranny and exhasut - which were woth more than $300.

And I am still slowly rebuilding the engine.

M
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
ptravnic
post Aug 22 2006, 01:39 PM
Post #14


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,231
Joined: 27-May 03
From: Chicago, IL
Member No.: 747
Region Association: None



QUOTE(SirAndy @ Aug 22 2006, 03:34 PM) *

(IMG:style_emoticons/default/agree.gif) my 2056 had between 155 and 165 ...



Sir Andy - What types of heads are you using on your 2056? 1.8L or 2.0L?

Chef - we'll talk later this w'end. Not sure what the heads look like when we take them off. They are coming off for a reason after all... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/blink.gif)

-pt
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Dr Evil
post Aug 22 2006, 01:59 PM
Post #15


Send me your transmission!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 23,034
Joined: 21-November 03
From: Loveland, OH 45140
Member No.: 1,372
Region Association: MidAtlantic Region



What you need to do, Rich, is either rebuild the 1.7 stock (not my first choice) or locate a good core 1.8/2.0 and rebuild it to what you want.

What = a 1911?
What = a 2056?

I forget which rod, crank, p/c combos go to each. If you get this info you can start to plan your attack. Is Leo keeping his engine?

For the record, what the guy wanted for the unverified size, rebuild and compression engine was not worth the parts.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
SirAndy
post Aug 22 2006, 02:07 PM
Post #16


Resident German
*************************

Group: Admin
Posts: 41,943
Joined: 21-January 03
From: Oakland, Kalifornia
Member No.: 179
Region Association: Northern California



QUOTE(ptravnic @ Aug 22 2006, 12:39 PM) *

Sir Andy - What types of heads are you using on your 2056? 1.8L or 2.0L?


the engine had 2.0L heads ...
(IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) Andy
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
SirAndy
post Aug 22 2006, 02:08 PM
Post #17


Resident German
*************************

Group: Admin
Posts: 41,943
Joined: 21-January 03
From: Oakland, Kalifornia
Member No.: 179
Region Association: Northern California



QUOTE(Dr Evil @ Aug 22 2006, 12:59 PM) *

What you need to do, Rich, is either rebuild the 1.7 stock (not my first choice) or locate a good core 1.8/2.0 and rebuild it to what you want.


and why not use his 1.7L case to build a 2056 or whatever he wants ???
(IMG:style_emoticons/default/confused24.gif) Andy
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
nycchef
post Aug 22 2006, 02:13 PM
Post #18


mechanical moron
***

Group: Members
Posts: 952
Joined: 28-November 05
From: new york city n.y.
Member No.: 5,202
Region Association: None



QUOTE

and why not use his 1.7L case to build a 2056 or whatever he wants ???
(IMG:style_emoticons/default/confused24.gif) Andy


andy was under the impression 1.7 heads could'nt be built out to either a 2.0 or 2056. am i wrong again?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
ptravnic
post Aug 22 2006, 02:13 PM
Post #19


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,231
Joined: 27-May 03
From: Chicago, IL
Member No.: 747
Region Association: None



QUOTE(Dr Evil @ Aug 22 2006, 03:59 PM) *

What = a 1911?
What = a 2056?



I *think* a 1911 is stock 1.8L crank/rods w/96mm P/C's.

I *know* a 2056 is stock 2.0L crank/rods w/96mm P/C's.

I forget what mm stroke the crank and length rods are on stock though (IMG:style_emoticons/default/sad.gif)
2056 is said to be the max to be used w/the slightly modified (dialed in MPS) D-Jet.


-pt
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
ptravnic
post Aug 22 2006, 02:17 PM
Post #20


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,231
Joined: 27-May 03
From: Chicago, IL
Member No.: 747
Region Association: None



QUOTE(nycchef @ Aug 22 2006, 04:13 PM) *

QUOTE

and why not use his 1.7L case to build a 2056 or whatever he wants ???
(IMG:style_emoticons/default/confused24.gif) Andy


andy was under the impression 1.7 heads could'nt be built out to either a 2.0 or 2056. am i wrong again?



Andy was talking about the case. You would need different heads (either 1.8L or 2.0L) then 96mm pistons w/either matching cylinders or get the 1.7L's honed out to match the 96's.

You'll see all of this first hand this w'end as my setup is 96mm p/c's, stock 2.0L crank/rods, 1.8L heads all built off what *was* a a1.7L case. The 1.7L case can be used for the other sizes...

-pt
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

3 Pages V  1 2 3 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 26th December 2024 - 11:43 AM