Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

3 Pages V < 1 2 3  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Front end neg camber, how much have you got, how'd ya get it
Dave_Darling
post Jul 18 2007, 08:54 PM
Post #41


914 Idiot
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 15,000
Joined: 9-January 03
From: Silicon Valley / Kailua-Kona
Member No.: 121
Region Association: Northern California



OK, now drop your car into the weeds so that the A-arm points upward slightly toward the outside. You're going to gain even less camber that way than if your car were higher off the ground. (Trade-off: Your car will tend to lean less because of the lower CG.) So you may need more static negative camber to counteract the body lean.

If you can lower the car's CG without shrinking the amount of negative camber gain, you sort of get the best of both worlds: You get reduced body lean and you get a little more negative camber when you do lean. That's one of the many joys of raised spindles...

--DD
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Borderline
post Jul 25 2007, 11:09 AM
Post #42


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 720
Joined: 8-February 05
From: San Juan Bautista, CA
Member No.: 3,577
Region Association: Northern California



My first attempt to get more negative...my wife says I'm always too negative.

Just poured these yesterday, gotta wait for em to cure up gud.

Chris, thanks for the support plates! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/aktion035.gif)


Attached image(s)
Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
jhadler
post Jul 25 2007, 11:13 AM
Post #43


Long term tinkerer...
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,879
Joined: 7-April 03
From: Lyons, CO
Member No.: 529



QUOTE(Borderline @ Jul 25 2007, 09:09 AM) *

My first attempt to get more negative...my wife says I'm always too negative.

Just poured these yesterday, gotta wait for em to cure up gud.


(IMG:style_emoticons/default/popcorn[1].gif) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/popcorn[1].gif) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/popcorn[1].gif)

Can't wait to hear how they work out!

-Josh2
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Joe Ricard
post Jul 25 2007, 11:47 AM
Post #44


CUMONIWANNARACEU
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 6,811
Joined: 5-January 03
From: Gautier, MS
Member No.: 92



Ok so I must have a mental block. if you lower the car to the point where the control arms point up then how do you prevent the shock from bottoming out.

The same thing with raising the spindles the length of the spindle never changed just the hieght of the upper shock mount and the whole car for that matter is lower. What kind of suspension travel is left.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
ottox914
post Jul 25 2007, 11:53 AM
Post #45


The glory that once was.
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,302
Joined: 15-December 03
From: Mahtomedi, MN
Member No.: 1,438
Region Association: Upper MidWest



QUOTE(Borderline @ Jul 25 2007, 09:09 AM) *

My first attempt to get more negative...my wife says I'm always too negative.

Just poured these yesterday, gotta wait for em to cure up gud.

Chris, thanks for the support plates! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/aktion035.gif)



That looks interesting. What exactally have you got going on there?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Joe Ricard
post Jul 25 2007, 12:48 PM
Post #46


CUMONIWANNARACEU
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 6,811
Joined: 5-January 03
From: Gautier, MS
Member No.: 92



How plyable is that stuff you poured?
Just asking because if it sets up solid as a rock then you will chance bending your shock piston rod.

If it is too plyable then why bother it will allow the alignment settings to go EVERYWHERE.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Borderline
post Jul 25 2007, 02:12 PM
Post #47


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 720
Joined: 8-February 05
From: San Juan Bautista, CA
Member No.: 3,577
Region Association: Northern California



I popped out the stock bushing/rubber grommet and removed the rubber. I then positioned the bushing to the side of the support plate and poured rtv around it to hold it in place. It should be about 80 durometer when fully cured. that stuff was expensive..$54/lb!! not available at Home Depot! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
jhadler
post Jul 25 2007, 02:33 PM
Post #48


Long term tinkerer...
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,879
Joined: 7-April 03
From: Lyons, CO
Member No.: 529



QUOTE(Borderline @ Jul 25 2007, 12:12 PM) *

I popped out the stock bushing/rubber grommet and removed the rubber. I then positioned the bushing to the side of the support plate and poured rtv around it to hold it in place. It should be about 80 durometer when fully cured. that stuff was expensive..$54/lb!! not available at Home Depot! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)


I'm not an expert, but I think that stuff is just gonna separate from the metal as soon as you apply a load. The original bushings are done like the trailing arm bushings, vulcanized.

Still, if it works, might be pretty nifty.

-Josh2
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Joe Ricard
post Jul 25 2007, 04:00 PM
Post #49


CUMONIWANNARACEU
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 6,811
Joined: 5-January 03
From: Gautier, MS
Member No.: 92



We use this stuff called "chock fast"
More on the line of what Josh is talking about.

I would be scared to try the RTV thing unless you did a destructive test on one 1st.
Like what does it take to push/pull/twist that stuff out. If after an hour of beating on it and you can't get it out then make a new one and put them in the car and take the front hood off. go to a parking lot and thrash it. If it stays put then it is maybe OK.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Borderline
post Jul 26 2007, 11:08 PM
Post #50


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 720
Joined: 8-February 05
From: San Juan Bautista, CA
Member No.: 3,577
Region Association: Northern California



The RTV thing is a two component polyurethane that cures to about 80 durometer, very similar to the stuff they use for suspension bushings. I used the stuff years ago, it's great stuff!! I'm not worried. I got them installed today and got a little over 2.5* negative. Haven't driven it yet, gotta an AX Sunday!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
ottox914
post Jul 27 2007, 09:37 PM
Post #51


The glory that once was.
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,302
Joined: 15-December 03
From: Mahtomedi, MN
Member No.: 1,438
Region Association: Upper MidWest



Could you take some metal rod of some sort, and weld/attach it to the ID of the camber plate, and to the sides of the strut bushing, then pour the goo in? Would that act a little like rebar in cement, in terms of keeping things togather under load?

Looking at my current front camber plates, they are the Tarrot style, with a spherical bearing solid mounted in an aluminum piece. Could you weld/attach that bearing to the inside of a stock camber plate with the rubber and stock bushing removed, and get the same result?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Borderline
post Jul 27 2007, 10:18 PM
Post #52


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 720
Joined: 8-February 05
From: San Juan Bautista, CA
Member No.: 3,577
Region Association: Northern California



QUOTE(ottox914 @ Jul 27 2007, 07:37 PM) *


Looking at my current front camber plates, they are the Tarrot style, with a spherical bearing solid mounted in an aluminum piece. Could you weld/attach that bearing to the inside of a stock camber plate with the rubber and stock bushing removed, and get the same result?



I thought of something like that but wasn't sure about not having any rubber in the system. I think it was Kevin Groot that posted how important it is to have the rubber grommets in the system unless you have all out racing shocks...which I don't. Is there any rubber in your Tarrot system?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
stownsen914
post Jul 28 2007, 05:33 AM
Post #53


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 918
Joined: 3-October 06
From: Ossining, NY
Member No.: 6,985
Region Association: None



QUOTE(ottox914 @ Jul 27 2007, 11:37 PM) *

Could you take some metal rod of some sort, and weld/attach it to the ID of the camber plate, and to the sides of the strut bushing, then pour the goo in? Would that act a little like rebar in cement, in terms of keeping things togather under load?


The tops of the shocks need to be able move as the suspenion moves through bump and droop. If I read your suggestion correctly, I think you were saying to solidly attach the strut bushing to the camber plate. If you do this, the suspension will bind (and the shock shaft would bend) ...
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
ottox914
post Jul 30 2007, 07:40 AM
Post #54


The glory that once was.
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,302
Joined: 15-December 03
From: Mahtomedi, MN
Member No.: 1,438
Region Association: Upper MidWest



QUOTE(Borderline @ Jul 27 2007, 08:18 PM) *

QUOTE(ottox914 @ Jul 27 2007, 07:37 PM) *


Looking at my current front camber plates, they are the Tarrot style, with a spherical bearing solid mounted in an aluminum piece. Could you weld/attach that bearing to the inside of a stock camber plate with the rubber and stock bushing removed, and get the same result?



I thought of something like that but wasn't sure about not having any rubber in the system. I think it was Kevin Groot that posted how important it is to have the rubber grommets in the system unless you have all out racing shocks...which I don't. Is there any rubber in your Tarrot system?


Here is a photo of the camber plates and top bearings.

http://www.paragon-products.com/photos/CM-1300-2.jpg

I'd be interested to read Groot's comments on rubber in the system- not that I don't believe him, but I'd like to learn a bit more and see what his thoughts are and the reasoning behind them. Can you copy the post or add a link to it?

And- had a chance to test your creation yet?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Borderline
post Jul 30 2007, 11:36 AM
Post #55


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 720
Joined: 8-February 05
From: San Juan Bautista, CA
Member No.: 3,577
Region Association: Northern California



I did a search but couldn't find the thread here! It was just my recollection from a few months ago. Here's a similar statement made at a different site...strut stoppers
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Chris Pincetich
post Jul 30 2007, 01:01 PM
Post #56


B-)
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,082
Joined: 3-October 05
From: Point Reyes Station, CA
Member No.: 4,907
Region Association: Northern California



Bill - I know I said you can have those camber plates, but I need them back now (IMG:style_emoticons/default/laugh.gif)

Regarding Groot's comments - I'm pretty sure the comment was focussed on bottoming out the struts, and needing the top rubber bump stops (they had another name too) to protect the shock internals, not necessarily for better suspension movement/alignment/properties.

More updates please! How did things go at Marina Sunday?

I work 5 blocks from EASY and have easy acces to buy used 914 parts...if you need another set to play with I could help out with the R&D (IMG:style_emoticons/default/beerchug.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Borderline
post Jul 30 2007, 01:52 PM
Post #57


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 720
Joined: 8-February 05
From: San Juan Bautista, CA
Member No.: 3,577
Region Association: Northern California



Too late Chris they're mine now!! They seemed to work great! I'm still slow on the Azenis but went 3 seconds faster on the victorocks! I was able to run laps comparable to DanT's!!!!! I don't know why I can't go fast on the azenis. They just don't seem to bite at all.

The overall setup of the car felt really good. No rear sway bar, 22mm T-bars, 19mm frnt sway set pretty stiff and 225# rear springs with the shocks set pretty soft. lower pressure in the victorocks. Dan suggested softer shocks and lower pressures. I was going to go stiffer on the shocks...seemed like what everyone else did. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/aktion035.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Chris Pincetich
post Jul 30 2007, 02:15 PM
Post #58


B-)
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,082
Joined: 3-October 05
From: Point Reyes Station, CA
Member No.: 4,907
Region Association: Northern California



I'm pretty sure that going to 2.5 neg camber is something the Victo's will like and the street tires will not. Time for some tire temps!

You may consider running JUST the Victo's in the future if you are not dealing with PCA car class issues. For 914Cup - do whatever seems fair, it's all gud. Those sticky tires will give smaller times and bigger smiles, and having you car set-up for them would be a big plus vs. finding a compromise to use both types of tires.

DIY camber plates are cool (IMG:style_emoticons/default/beerchug.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

3 Pages V < 1 2 3
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 26th June 2024 - 12:52 AM