Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> 2.0 HP ?, 100 or 85?
tracks914
post Mar 29 2008, 02:53 PM
Post #1


Canadian Member
****

Group: Benefactors
Posts: 2,083
Joined: 15-January 03
From: Timmins, Ontario, Canada
Member No.: 153
Region Association: None



I just bought a '75 2.0. The manual says it has 84hp and 97 lb.ft of torque. I have read different sites and here claiming it has 100hp. What is it and what would the difference be?
Tx
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
tracks914
post Mar 29 2008, 03:03 PM
Post #2


Canadian Member
****

Group: Benefactors
Posts: 2,083
Joined: 15-January 03
From: Timmins, Ontario, Canada
Member No.: 153
Region Association: None



Forget it, I found the page. It appears I have a GC Engine @ ~88hp. Now how do I get this up to 100? Pistons?
It appears the US GA engine @ 96hp has 7.6:1 and so does the GC.
The Euro engine has 8:1 and 100hp????
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
SirAndy
post Mar 29 2008, 03:15 PM
Post #3


Resident German
*************************

Group: Admin
Posts: 41,954
Joined: 21-January 03
From: Oakland, Kalifornia
Member No.: 179
Region Association: Northern California



QUOTE(tracks914 @ Mar 29 2008, 02:03 PM) *

Forget it, I found the page. It appears I have a GC Engine @ ~88hp. Now how do I get this up to 100? Pistons?
It appears the US GA engine @ 96hp has 7.6:1 and so does the GC.
The Euro engine has 8:1 and 100hp????


yes, euro spec ran higher compression, thus more HP ...
(IMG:style_emoticons/default/bye1.gif) Andy

PS: the '75/'76 were choked down by all the smog equipment, which resulted in less HP ...
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
davep
post Mar 29 2008, 04:39 PM
Post #4


914 Historian
*****

Group: Benefactors
Posts: 5,225
Joined: 13-October 03
From: Burford, ON, N0E 1A0
Member No.: 1,244
Region Association: Canada



QUOTE(SirAndy @ Mar 29 2008, 01:15 PM) *

PS: the '75/'76 were choked down by all the smog equipment, which resulted in less HP ...

Not to mention the piss-poor exhaust pipes...
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Brando
post Mar 29 2008, 08:52 PM
Post #5


BUY MY SPARE KIDNEY!!!
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,935
Joined: 29-August 04
From: Santa Ana, CA
Member No.: 2,648
Region Association: Southern California



How to get 100hp out of your stock late 2.0?

Switch over to early 2.0 style heat-exchangers (preferably SSI) + a bursch muffler.

Remove your emissions control equipment. That means smog pump, air injectors on the heads (plug them), EGR stuff, all that.

Oh, don't forget to put in some euro pistons. (higher compression).

That's pretty much it before you start messing with the AFR and timing...
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
tracks914
post Mar 29 2008, 09:27 PM
Post #6


Canadian Member
****

Group: Benefactors
Posts: 2,083
Joined: 15-January 03
From: Timmins, Ontario, Canada
Member No.: 153
Region Association: None



Pistons I can see but what about the cam shaft? Is it the same for Euros and US?
I thought I read that a 1.7 had better flowing HE's than '75 2.0. Is this right? I have a set of SS HE's for a 1.7.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
SirAndy
post Mar 29 2008, 09:35 PM
Post #7


Resident German
*************************

Group: Admin
Posts: 41,954
Joined: 21-January 03
From: Oakland, Kalifornia
Member No.: 179
Region Association: Northern California



QUOTE(tracks914 @ Mar 29 2008, 08:27 PM) *

what about the cam shaft? Is it the same for Euros and US?
yes ...


QUOTE(tracks914 @ Mar 29 2008, 08:27 PM) *

I thought I read that a 1.7 had better flowing HE's than '75 2.0. Is this right? I have a set of SS HE's for a 1.7.
yes ...


(IMG:style_emoticons/default/bye1.gif) Andy
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
championgt1
post Mar 29 2008, 09:39 PM
Post #8


Don't embarrass me Filmore!
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,680
Joined: 3-January 07
From: Tacoma, Washington
Member No.: 7,420
Region Association: Pacific Northwest



My car is a 74 2.0. It has euro p/c and a hydrallic cam. Car was dynoed at 98 horse at the wheels.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
swl
post Mar 30 2008, 06:11 AM
Post #9


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,409
Joined: 7-August 05
From: Kingston,On,Canada
Member No.: 4,550
Region Association: Canada



So does this mean you bought that parts car?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
tracks914
post Mar 30 2008, 08:01 AM
Post #10


Canadian Member
****

Group: Benefactors
Posts: 2,083
Joined: 15-January 03
From: Timmins, Ontario, Canada
Member No.: 153
Region Association: None



QUOTE(swl @ Mar 30 2008, 04:11 AM) *

So does this mean you bought that parts car?

Yes
and Andy I did update the VIN registry.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 2nd January 2025 - 02:01 PM