Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

6 Pages V « < 2 3 4 5 6 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> My MicroSquirt Install
McMark
post Nov 14 2008, 11:32 AM
Post #61


914 Freak!
***************

Group: Retired Admin
Posts: 20,179
Joined: 13-March 03
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Member No.: 419
Region Association: None



Okay, here's the update... The MicroSquirt doesn't really run as fuel only. We had a lot of problems with the unit resetting each time a spark plug fired. So this has been sitting a bit while I develop a nice crank fire setup. Plus making the decision of whether to do Coil-Near-Plug or a traditional setup. And finally, my test motor had to leave. But the new test motor will be done next week. I'm waiting to get the crank trigger wheel from the machine shop. I'll keep ya'll posted, but we probably won't have any serious testing underway until late Dec, or in the new year.

QUOTE
what about the naked wires on teh back of teh ECU plug?

The only bare wire is a 'shield'. It's just for protecting EMI, not actually carrying current.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
banger
post Nov 14 2008, 11:37 AM
Post #62


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 354
Joined: 12-November 06
From: Santa Clarita
Member No.: 7,205
Region Association: Southern California



Actually you can do coil on plug quite easily with the megasquirt. You dont need the extra board either. You can take the Ford EDIS module, and instead of having it run coilpacks, it can be wired to run coil on plug. It is still running a wasted spar system, but instead of having 1 coil fire 2 plugs, now you have 2 coils firing 2 plugs.

QUOTE(CliffBraun @ Nov 13 2008, 10:48 PM) *

Re MS and going distributorless, there is apparently some board in development that would let you fire up to 8 injectors and plugs on their own. In my mind this becomes a very efficient, very nifty coil on plug system. The injector thing is cool, but you're really only getting benefit at low RPM (primarily low temp, even) because your injectors are open longer than the valves at the top end.
Anywho, I would have linked the page but I couldn't find it. Does anybody know any more about this than I?

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mark Henry
post Nov 14 2008, 11:40 AM
Post #63


that's what I do!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 20,065
Joined: 27-December 02
From: Port Hope, Ontario
Member No.: 26
Region Association: Canada



I'd go with the coils Tim has in his pic's, same as what SDS uses (although Tim's coils are aftermarket), basically off the shelf GM units.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
CliffBraun
post Nov 14 2008, 03:50 PM
Post #64


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 252
Joined: 26-April 06
From: San Luis Obispo,ca
Member No.: 5,933
Region Association: None



QUOTE(banger @ Nov 14 2008, 09:37 AM) *

Actually you can do coil on plug quite easily with the megasquirt. You dont need the extra board either. You can take the Ford EDIS module, and instead of having it run coilpacks, it can be wired to run coil on plug. It is still running a wasted spar system, but instead of having 1 coil fire 2 plugs, now you have 2 coils firing 2 plugs.

QUOTE(CliffBraun @ Nov 13 2008, 10:48 PM) *

Re MS and going distributorless, there is apparently some board in development that would let you fire up to 8 injectors and plugs on their own. In my mind this becomes a very efficient, very nifty coil on plug system. The injector thing is cool, but you're really only getting benefit at low RPM (primarily low temp, even) because your injectors are open longer than the valves at the top end.
Anywho, I would have linked the page but I couldn't find it. Does anybody know any more about this than I?



I'm aware of this, I just don't like the idea of wasted spark (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) . Not that that is really rational. I like the idea of per cylinder control, though. Still havn't managed to find the page on the other board.

Hm, on further thought with just a crank sensor you kinda have to run wasted spark, I remember MS having another method of picking up where you are in your cycle though, have to go figure that out later.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
type47
post Nov 14 2008, 05:11 PM
Post #65


Viermeister
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,254
Joined: 7-August 03
From: Vienna, VA
Member No.: 994
Region Association: MidAtlantic Region



what is the compatibility between MS and the type of camshaft? is MS sensitive to agressive cams like D-jet? the reason i ask is my "next" motor is to be a 96mm digital FI motor but i have a "race" motor on the floor that had carbs. i don't remember the specs on the cam, i have the build sheet, but i'd bet it was a carb cam. so my question is (to save me from building a motor up from the crank), can i install MS on this "race" motor?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
MartyYeoman
post Nov 14 2008, 05:25 PM
Post #66


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,525
Joined: 19-June 03
From: San Ramon, CA
Member No.: 839
Region Association: Northern California



QUOTE(type47 @ Nov 14 2008, 03:11 PM) *

What is the compatibility between MS and the type of camshaft?


This question has been in the the back of my mind for this entire thread.

Mark,
What cam type are you testing with?
It this system compatible with the stock L-jet cam?
Marty

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mark Henry
post Nov 14 2008, 05:35 PM
Post #67


that's what I do!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 20,065
Joined: 27-December 02
From: Port Hope, Ontario
Member No.: 26
Region Association: Canada



QUOTE(Marty Yeoman @ Nov 14 2008, 06:25 PM) *

QUOTE(type47 @ Nov 14 2008, 03:11 PM) *

What is the compatibility between MS and the type of camshaft?


This question has been in the the back of my mind for this entire thread.

Mark,
What cam type are you testing with?
It this system compatible with the stock L-jet cam?
Marty


Any of the PEFI systems out there will run a stock cam fine, just don't expect any extra power just because of the PEFI.
BTW I've done SDS on both a stock 1800 and 2.0 so this isn't a guess.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Rick_Eberle
post Nov 14 2008, 05:38 PM
Post #68


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 390
Joined: 14-January 04
From: Geelong, Australia
Member No.: 1,558



QUOTE(type47 @ Nov 15 2008, 10:11 AM) *

what is the compatibility between MS and the type of camshaft? is MS sensitive to agressive cams like D-jet? the reason i ask is my "next" motor is to be a 96mm digital FI motor but i have a "race" motor on the floor that had carbs. i don't remember the specs on the cam, i have the build sheet, but i'd bet it was a carb cam. so my question is (to save me from building a motor up from the crank), can i install MS on this "race" motor?


You can tune it around any cam. MS can be switched from "Speed Density" (Manifold Pressure) to "Alpa-n" (RPM-Throttle Position), or with the EXTRA code, a blend of the two.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
McMark
post Nov 15 2008, 11:17 PM
Post #69


914 Freak!
***************

Group: Retired Admin
Posts: 20,179
Joined: 13-March 03
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Member No.: 419
Region Association: None



(IMG:style_emoticons/default/agree.gif) with both of the above. Every new cam, or more generally, every new motor combo (heads, cam, bore, stroke, CR, etc) will need a new tuning of the FI maps. So yes it's useable, but it still needs to be tuned.

I got a picture of the trigger wheel from the machine shop. A bit of a goof on two of the holes, but that's fixed on the future ones. This trigger wheel will drop on in place of the fan spacer. Once I get this in hand, I'll need to devise a sensor mount. Ideally, it'll be something that could be installed without removing the fan housing. But we'll see about that.


Attached image(s)
Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
ConeDodger
post Nov 16 2008, 12:12 PM
Post #70


Apex killer!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 23,759
Joined: 31-December 04
From: Tahoe Area
Member No.: 3,380
Region Association: Northern California



Nice Mark!
The fan comes apart right? What if you took off the back piece and remanufactured it to be a trigger wheel. Then you could rebalance the whole thing. I like what you have done. This is just an idea I had and I wonder if you think it would work?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
McMark
post Nov 17 2008, 11:24 AM
Post #71


914 Freak!
***************

Group: Retired Admin
Posts: 20,179
Joined: 13-March 03
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Member No.: 419
Region Association: None



It would definitely work, it would just be lots more labor intensive than this. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wink.gif) Actually, I think in the case of modding the fan, it would be sufficient to simply insert a magnet in the perimeter.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
toon1
post Nov 17 2008, 12:59 PM
Post #72


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,849
Joined: 29-October 05
From: tracy,ca
Member No.: 5,022



Nice trigger wheel Mark.

I mounted the VR sensor in the back side of the fan housing. It worked great. I was able to get the distance between the wheel and the sensot to about .75mm.

I took the fan housing on and off a few times to double check that things did not change and it's very repeatable.

It's been about 4k miles with no issues. Have pics if needed.


User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
smdubovsky
post Nov 17 2008, 01:21 PM
Post #73


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 331
Joined: 27-September 04
From: Silver Spring, MD
Member No.: 2,837
Region Association: MidAtlantic Region



QUOTE(kconway @ Nov 13 2008, 03:50 PM) *

Looks like they can be had here with a min buy of 1 for $16.75 http://www.mouser.com/Search/ProductDetail...WfMWf98IA%3d%3d


Cool. Do be aware the different colors are keyed differently. (A red wont plug into a black.) You have to get both M&F halves of the same color.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
3d914
post Nov 17 2008, 01:33 PM
Post #74


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,275
Joined: 24-September 03
From: Benson, AZ
Member No.: 1,191
Region Association: Southwest Region



Jim & Marty,

I had the Web #73 cam with my 2.0/4 using Megasquirt - and that was before they had the combined Speed-density/Alph-N. Iwas able to get that cam with some overlap to idle well. The stock cam would have been a piece of cake, since it has no overlap (IIRC).

The real benefits you'll find with the new systems is the simpler & more reliable MAP sensors. No more guessing either - you get good sensor feedback in real-time. You'll NEVER GO BACK!

Keep up the good work Mark.

Enjoy,
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
McMark
post Jan 5 2009, 09:43 PM
Post #75


914 Freak!
***************

Group: Retired Admin
Posts: 20,179
Joined: 13-March 03
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Member No.: 419
Region Association: None



FINALLY made some more progress on this install. I got the toothed wheel back from Mike Mueller, who did the mods for me. It fits just fine and I installed it on my latest 2056 during the cam break in. So it spins just fine, as expected.

I did a lot of searching in the back room of my local NAPA, opening every VR sensor box they had to find one that was small and light. This is the one that I found and I assembled a quick test bracket. The VR sensor will mount on the existing case stud so there will be no holes or other modifications made to any parts.

Installing this system will require the motor to be removed and the fan housing to be unbolted. Even though removing the motor isn't ideal for a 'bolt-on' system, I think that eliminating the need for permanent modifications is a worthwhile goal.

Anyway, here's the pics. I have a couple videos as well that I'll post shortly. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/cool.gif)


Attached image(s)
Attached Image Attached Image Attached Image Attached Image Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
McMark
post Jan 5 2009, 10:14 PM
Post #76


914 Freak!
***************

Group: Retired Admin
Posts: 20,179
Joined: 13-March 03
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Member No.: 419
Region Association: None



Videos!

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
toon1
post Jan 6 2009, 09:35 AM
Post #77


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,849
Joined: 29-October 05
From: tracy,ca
Member No.: 5,022



Slick!!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
alex914
post Jan 6 2009, 04:23 PM
Post #78


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 24
Joined: 2-July 07
From: redwood city, ca
Member No.: 7,861



That's great!

QUOTE(McMark @ Jan 5 2009, 08:14 PM) *

Videos!<br>

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Dr Evil
post Jan 6 2009, 04:35 PM
Post #79


Send me your transmission!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 23,032
Joined: 21-November 03
From: Loveland, OH 45140
Member No.: 1,372
Region Association: MidAtlantic Region



Can you use the micro squirt without the ignition feature? I would be interested in using only the stock D-jet parameters initially: TPS, MAP. I have a friend interested in this.
Thanks and great job so far (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
jhadler
post Jan 6 2009, 04:47 PM
Post #80


Long term tinkerer...
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,879
Joined: 7-April 03
From: Lyons, CO
Member No.: 529



Okay! That's super slick!

Giving me an idea for mounting the trigger wheel of my (sitting-on-a-shelf-gathering-dust) electromotive ignition...

Now that the motor is fully apart, now would be the time to make that change...

Then, if it's unobtrusive, I can leave it there 'till I decide to implement all of it.

Hmm....

-Josh2
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

6 Pages V « < 2 3 4 5 6 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 28th September 2024 - 04:09 PM