Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V  1 2 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Aftermarket TypeIV motor mounts, ...anyone have lightweight solid mounts?
Chris Hamilton
post Jan 22 2009, 05:40 PM
Post #1


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 611
Joined: 7-March 06
From: Berkeley, CA
Member No.: 5,687



Anyone here have leads on aftermarket motor mounts? I think I remember SirAndy having one made of box chromoly when he was still running a 4-banger. I'm looking for something solid and lighter than the stock bar.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mark Henry
post Jan 22 2009, 05:48 PM
Post #2


that's what I do!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 20,065
Joined: 27-December 02
From: Port Hope, Ontario
Member No.: 26
Region Association: Canada



For the rubber mounts I wouldn't run anything but the stock mounts unless it's an all out race car. As for the bar you could fab up a bar that's lighter, but to be strong enough the weight savings would be small.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Chris Hamilton
post Jan 22 2009, 08:02 PM
Post #3


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 611
Joined: 7-March 06
From: Berkeley, CA
Member No.: 5,687



QUOTE(Mark Henry @ Jan 22 2009, 03:48 PM) *

For the rubber mounts I wouldn't run anything but the stock mounts unless it's an all out race car. As for the bar you could fab up a bar that's lighter, but to be strong enough the weight savings would be small.


Yeah, I'm looking for a bar that's lighter than the stock one.

This is for my trailered racecar, you might have seen it before:

(IMG:http://www.thextremeresources.com/boshi/images/cars/aX1.jpg)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Aaron Cox
post Jan 22 2009, 08:04 PM
Post #4


Professional Lawn Dart
***************

Group: Retired Admin
Posts: 24,541
Joined: 1-February 03
From: OC
Member No.: 219
Region Association: Southern California



Make a pair on the lathe, shouldnt take you more than a half hour (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) (assuming you have a sideshift)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
SGB
post Jan 22 2009, 08:29 PM
Post #5


just visiting
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,086
Joined: 8-March 03
From: Huntsville, AL
Member No.: 404
Region Association: South East States



Its been done. I think the weight savings were pretty minimal , as stated above. Seems like it wasn't even a full pound in reduced weight.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
McMark
post Jan 22 2009, 08:38 PM
Post #6


914 Freak!
***************

Group: Retired Admin
Posts: 20,179
Joined: 13-March 03
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Member No.: 419
Region Association: None



I wonder is a T bar would make it lighter. Four tubes for bolt passthrough, flat plate on top parallel to the ground, flat plate vertical.

I bet that would do it, and weight a lot less. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/idea.gif)

I have a mount bar laying around here. I could whip up a prototype... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/welder.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Chris Hamilton
post Jan 23 2009, 09:44 AM
Post #7


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 611
Joined: 7-March 06
From: Berkeley, CA
Member No.: 5,687



McMark that sounds interesting. I'm not sure what you mean though, you're talking about a motor mount like the -6 has?

Also anybody remember SirAndy's motor mount back when he had a type IV?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
J P Stein
post Jan 23 2009, 10:08 AM
Post #8


Irrelevant old fart
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 8,797
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Vancouver, WA
Member No.: 45
Region Association: None



QUOTE(Chris Hamilton @ Jan 22 2009, 06:02 PM) *



This is for my trailered racecar, you might have seen it before:


Ayup, sure is ugly. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)
Pretty quick tho. 2nd place material.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
ChrisFoley
post Jan 23 2009, 11:06 AM
Post #9


I am Tangerine Racing
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 7,969
Joined: 29-January 03
From: Bolton, CT
Member No.: 209
Region Association: None



Why would you want to lighten one of the lowest parts of the car? That will raise your cg.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
McMark
post Jan 23 2009, 01:22 PM
Post #10


914 Freak!
***************

Group: Retired Admin
Posts: 20,179
Joined: 13-March 03
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Member No.: 419
Region Association: None



Here's a mockup design.


Attached image(s)
Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
ericread
post Jan 23 2009, 01:29 PM
Post #11


The Viper Blue 914
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,177
Joined: 7-December 07
From: Irvine, CA (The OC)
Member No.: 8,432
Region Association: Southern California



How does your design ensure there is no rotational flex, or do you feel this is not an issue? Do you believe this design can meet the stock design of keeping the engine in a very static position?

(IMG:style_emoticons/default/idea.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
McMark
post Jan 23 2009, 01:45 PM
Post #12


914 Freak!
***************

Group: Retired Admin
Posts: 20,179
Joined: 13-March 03
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Member No.: 419
Region Association: None



Eric, rotational stress along the length should occur between the center and the ends. There will never been end to end torsion, because the body is relatively solid (for the purposes of this design study). So you have a 1.75' section that's twisting, which is pretty short. I think the T-structure will provide sufficient strength.

Torsion comparisons between this design and the stock bar would be fairly easy to conduct. Drilling holes would also be an option that could be tested....
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
ericread
post Jan 23 2009, 01:47 PM
Post #13


The Viper Blue 914
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,177
Joined: 7-December 07
From: Irvine, CA (The OC)
Member No.: 8,432
Region Association: Southern California



QUOTE(McMark @ Jan 23 2009, 11:45 AM) *

Eric, rotational stress along the length should occur between the center and the ends. There will never been end to end torsion, because the body is relatively solid (for the purposes of this design study). So you have a 1.75' section that's twisting, which is pretty short. I think the T-structure will provide sufficient strength.

Torsion comparisons between this design and the stock bar would be fairly easy to conduct. Drilling holes would also be an option that could be tested....


Cool (IMG:style_emoticons/default/aktion035.gif)

So how much weight do you anticipate saving?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mark Henry
post Jan 23 2009, 02:17 PM
Post #14


that's what I do!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 20,065
Joined: 27-December 02
From: Port Hope, Ontario
Member No.: 26
Region Association: Canada



You will need a hole for the shift rod.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
J P Stein
post Jan 23 2009, 07:03 PM
Post #15


Irrelevant old fart
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 8,797
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Vancouver, WA
Member No.: 45
Region Association: None



BTW, if ya'll want a rematch, it'll be at Packwood WA, August 8 & 9.
Ya'll come to our house & lay a whippin' on us'n & we'll call it even. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)

I think Andrew remembers this car.


Attached image(s)
Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Chris Hamilton
post Jan 24 2009, 07:06 PM
Post #16


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 611
Joined: 7-March 06
From: Berkeley, CA
Member No.: 5,687



QUOTE(J P Stein @ Jan 23 2009, 05:03 PM) *

BTW, if ya'll want a rematch, it'll be at Packwood WA, August 8 & 9.
Ya'll come to our house & lay a whippin' on us'n & we'll call it even. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)

I think Andrew remembers this car.



Yeah I remember that second place you got to our first on sunday (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif) As I remember it we're already tied (BMWs don't count dammit )

How about a rematch without tire warmers? (IMG:style_emoticons/default/driving.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Chris Hamilton
post Jan 24 2009, 07:09 PM
Post #17


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 611
Joined: 7-March 06
From: Berkeley, CA
Member No.: 5,687



QUOTE(Racer Chris @ Jan 23 2009, 09:06 AM) *

Why would you want to lighten one of the lowest parts of the car? That will raise your cg.



I'm not too worried about the CG when the whole car needs to be lighter. By that logic we should be adding lead panels to the floors to lower the CG. Overall weight is a much more important factor right now.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
J P Stein
post Jan 24 2009, 07:21 PM
Post #18


Irrelevant old fart
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 8,797
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Vancouver, WA
Member No.: 45
Region Association: None



QUOTE(Chris Hamilton @ Jan 24 2009, 05:06 PM) *

QUOTE(J P Stein @ Jan 23 2009, 05:03 PM) *

BTW, if ya'll want a rematch, it'll be at Packwood WA, August 8 & 9.
Ya'll come to our house & lay a whippin' on us'n & we'll call it even. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)

I think Andrew remembers this car.



Yeah I remember that second place you got to our first on sunday (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif) As I remember it we're already tied (BMWs don't count dammit )

How about a rematch without tire warmers? (IMG:style_emoticons/default/driving.gif)


Well the event was cumulative times for 2 days just like the SCCA does at the Nationals, but Andrew did a fine come back on day 2....... but not enuff to make up for the first day's ass kicking.

Sure, no tire warmers and no changing the car for day 2. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)

Brit's unfortunate cones after the lights on his last run let both you'z guys and the Beemer thru on day 2. We did OK for our first time on concrete *at your house*.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Chris Hamilton
post Jan 25 2009, 12:52 PM
Post #19


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 611
Joined: 7-March 06
From: Berkeley, CA
Member No.: 5,687



QUOTE(McMark @ Jan 23 2009, 11:22 AM) *

Here's a mockup design.



I like that design, but the car still has a sideshifter and typical linkage. I'll have to take some measurements of the hole in the stock motor mount.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
McMark
post Jan 25 2009, 09:01 PM
Post #20


914 Freak!
***************

Group: Retired Admin
Posts: 20,179
Joined: 13-March 03
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Member No.: 419
Region Association: None



Clearance for the shifter wouldn't be too big of a deal. I'm searching for appropriate 'tubes' for the bolts to pass through.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

2 Pages V  1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 2nd January 2025 - 10:14 PM